AMZW vs. EINC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AMZW (Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. AMZW is actively managed, while EINC is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. AMZW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.

Performance

AMZW vs. EINC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZW achieves a 7.52% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 24.74% return.

AMZW

• 1D: -3.13%
• 1M: -10.10%
• YTD: 7.52%
• 6M: 6.32%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EINC

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: -1.60%
• YTD: 24.74%
• 6M: 24.40%
• 1Y: 26.00%
• 3Y*: 29.18%
• 5Y*: 20.73%
• 10Y*: 11.62%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZW vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF	7.52%	7.33%
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	24.74%	2.58%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZW and EINC is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2025	-0.18

AMZW vs. EINC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMZW	EINC
Consumer Cyclical	24.9%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	99.5%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	2.5%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	0.6%

Return for Risk

AMZW vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EINC

EINC Risk / Return Rank: 53
EINC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
EINC Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
EINC Omega Ratio Rank: 49
EINC Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
EINC Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZW vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMZW	EINC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.07	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.04	+0.40

Drawdowns

AMZW vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZW drawdown since its inception was -26.79%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZW and EINC.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMZW	EINC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.79%	-87.55%	+60.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-7.89%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-16.01%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.87%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-68.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.45%	-5.44%	-6.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.89%	-44.29%	+35.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.85%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMZW	EINC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.39%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	11.57%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.99%	14.72%	+22.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	36.99%	19.58%	+17.41%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.99%	25.43%	+11.56%

AMZW vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMZW vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison

AMZW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.04%, more than EINC's 3.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF	43.04%	25.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF	3.55%	4.51%	3.33%	3.77%	2.89%	6.03%	6.69%	9.66%	11.31%	8.53%	9.71%	28.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMZW and EINC in my portfolio?

AMZW and EINC have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AMZW or EINC?

On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMZW or EINC?

EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMZW or EINC?

AMZW has the higher dividend yield at 43.04%, compared with 3.55% for EINC.

What is the main difference between AMZW and EINC?

AMZW is categorized as Derivative Income, while EINC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZW and 0.45% for EINC.