AMZW vs. AMZZ

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

AMZW (Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF) and AMZZ (GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZW is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while AMZZ is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMZW returned 6.63% vs 2.05% for AMZZ. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AMZW charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for AMZZ.

Performance

AMZW vs. AMZZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZW achieves a -0.73% return, which is significantly higher than AMZZ's -5.24% return.

AMZW

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -14.89%
• YTD: -0.73%
• 6M: -1.71%
• 1Y: 6.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMZZ

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -24.31%
• YTD: -5.24%
• 6M: -6.67%
• 1Y: 2.05%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZW vs. AMZZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF	-0.73%	7.33%
AMZZ GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF	-5.24%	5.46%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZW and AMZZ is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.99

The correlation between AMZW and AMZZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

AMZW vs. AMZZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMZW	AMZZ
Consumer Cyclical	24.5%	66.7%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AMZW vs. AMZZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZW

AMZW Risk / Return Rank: 12
AMZW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
AMZW Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
AMZW Omega Ratio Rank: 12
AMZW Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
AMZW Martin Ratio Rank: 11

AMZZ

AMZZ Risk / Return Rank: 10
AMZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
AMZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
AMZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 12
AMZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
AMZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZW vs. AMZZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMZW	AMZZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.18	0.03	+0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.52	0.49	+0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.06	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.25	0.05	+0.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.56	0.11	+0.45

AMZW vs. AMZZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZW Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is higher than the AMZZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZW and AMZZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMZW vs. AMZZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZW drawdown since its inception was -26.79%, smaller than the maximum AMZZ drawdown of -55.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZW and AMZZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMZW	AMZZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.79%	-55.28%	+28.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.79%	-41.97%	+15.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.25%	-29.02%	+10.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.19%	-20.27%	+11.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.87%	19.32%	-7.45%

Volatility

AMZW vs. AMZZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) is 12.09%, while GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ) has a volatility of 20.15%. This indicates that AMZW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMZZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMZW	AMZZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.09%	20.15%	-8.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.19%	43.06%	-16.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.44%	61.32%	-23.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.27%	63.04%	-25.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.27%	63.04%	-25.77%

AMZW vs. AMZZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than AMZZ's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMZW vs. AMZZ - Dividend Comparison

AMZW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 49.16%, while AMZZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF	49.16%	25.29%
AMZZ GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMZW and AMZZ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, AMZW and AMZZ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, AMZW or AMZZ?

AMZZ has higher volatility (20.15%) compared to AMZW (12.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZW dropped -26.79% vs AMZZ's -55.28%.

Which ETF is better, AMZW or AMZZ?

On 1-year performance, AMZW leads with 6.63% vs 2.05% for AMZZ. On fees, AMZW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, AMZW has been the lower-risk option at 12.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMZW or AMZZ?

Over the 1-year period, AMZW has performed better with a 6.63% return vs 2.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMZW or AMZZ?

AMZW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AMZZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMZW or AMZZ?

AMZW has the higher dividend yield at 49.16%, compared with 0.00% for AMZZ.

What is the main difference between AMZW and AMZZ?

AMZW is categorized as Derivative Income, while AMZZ is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZW and 1.15% for AMZZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMZW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.18 vs 0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.