AMZW vs. ACYS

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

AMZW (Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF) and ACYS (FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMZW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ACYS.

Performance

AMZW vs. ACYS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AMZW

• 1D: -2.39%
• 1M: 1.52%
• 6M: 3.18%
• YTD: 7.08%
• 1Y: 8.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ACYS

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.51%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZW vs. ACYS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF	-3.55%
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF	2.15%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZW and ACYS is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 23, 2026	0.28

Return for Risk

AMZW vs. ACYS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZW

AMZW Risk / Return Rank: 14
AMZW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
AMZW Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
AMZW Omega Ratio Rank: 15
AMZW Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
AMZW Martin Ratio Rank: 13

ACYS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZW vs. ACYS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF (AMZW) and FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF (ACYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMZW	ACYS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.24	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.60	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.33	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.72	—	—

Drawdowns

AMZW vs. ACYS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZW drawdown since its inception was -26.79%, which is greater than ACYS's maximum drawdown of -0.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZW and ACYS.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMZW	ACYS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.79%	-0.63%	-26.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.82%	-0.10%	-11.72%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.49%	-0.14%	-9.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.41%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMZW	ACYS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.54%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.54%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.79%	3.38%	+34.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	37.08%	3.38%	+33.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	37.08%	3.38%	+33.70%

AMZW vs. ACYS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ACYS's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMZW vs. ACYS - Dividend Comparison

AMZW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 45.90%, more than ACYS's 0.60% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
ACYS FT Vest Laddered Autocallable Barrier & Resilient Income ETF	0.60%	0.00%
AMZW Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF	45.90%	25.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMZW and ACYS in my portfolio?

AMZW and ACYS have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AMZW or ACYS?

On fees, ACYS is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMZW or ACYS?

ACYS is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMZW or ACYS?

AMZW has the higher dividend yield at 45.90%, compared with 0.60% for ACYS.

What is the main difference between AMZW and ACYS?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZW and 0.75% for ACYS.