PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZP vs. QQQY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMZP vs. QQQY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZP achieves a 8.22% return, which is significantly lower than QQQY's 19.50% return.


AMZP

1D
-1.91%
1M
-5.00%
YTD
8.22%
6M
7.97%
1Y
23.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQY

1D
0.44%
1M
9.90%
YTD
19.50%
6M
19.98%
1Y
37.77%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZP vs. QQQY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AMZP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF
8.22%9.56%37.42%7.73%
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
19.50%14.96%7.70%8.21%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZP and QQQY is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023

0.62

The correlation between AMZP and QQQY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZP vs. QQQY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZP
AMZP Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
AMZP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZP Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZP Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQY
QQQY Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
QQQY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZP vs. QQQY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) and Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMZPQQQYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.83

2.78

-1.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.28

3.48

-2.20

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.51

-0.35

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.05

3.49

-2.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.71

14.87

-12.15

AMZP vs. QQQY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZP Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the QQQY Sharpe Ratio of 2.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZP and QQQY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMZPQQQYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

2.78

-1.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

1.26

-0.34

Drawdowns

AMZP vs. QQQY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZP drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, which is greater than QQQY's maximum drawdown of -19.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZP and QQQY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZPQQQYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.36%

-19.05%

-8.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.64%

-11.14%

-12.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.65%

0.00%

-7.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.02%

-2.91%

-3.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.15%

2.61%

+6.54%

Volatility

AMZP vs. QQQY - Volatility Comparison

Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) has a higher volatility of 8.11% compared to Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF (QQQY) at 4.17%. This indicates that AMZP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZPQQQYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.11%

4.17%

+3.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.00%

11.29%

+10.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.99%

13.68%

+15.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.81%

14.76%

+12.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.81%

14.76%

+12.05%

AMZP vs. QQQY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both AMZP and QQQY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

AMZP vs. QQQY - Dividend Comparison

AMZP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.00%, less than QQQY's 34.21% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMZP
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF
19.00%22.04%15.15%2.45%
QQQY
Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF
34.21%45.34%83.34%20.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMZP and QQQY have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMZP has higher volatility (8.11%) compared to QQQY (4.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZP dropped -27.36% vs QQQY's -19.05%.

On 1-year performance, QQQY leads with 37.77% vs 23.84% for AMZP. Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. On volatility, QQQY has been the lower-risk option at 4.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQQY has performed better with a 37.77% return vs 23.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AMZP and QQQY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

QQQY has the higher dividend yield at 34.21%, compared with 19.00% for AMZP.

AMZP is categorized as Options Trading, while QQQY is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and Defiance.

QQQY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZP and QQQY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer