AMZP vs. MSFY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AMZP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF) and MSFY (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZP is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Kurv, while MSFY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMZP returned 20.81% vs -7.25% for MSFY. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMZP charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for MSFY.

Performance

AMZP vs. MSFY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZP achieves a 5.27% return, which is significantly higher than MSFY's -13.99% return.

AMZP

• 1D: -2.73%
• 1M: -8.93%
• YTD: 5.27%
• 6M: 5.85%
• 1Y: 20.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSFY

• 1D: -3.43%
• 1M: 4.37%
• YTD: -13.99%
• 6M: -12.67%
• 1Y: -7.25%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZP vs. MSFY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF	5.27%	9.56%	37.42%	7.73%
MSFY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF	-13.99%	14.11%	10.88%	2.57%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZP and MSFY is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023	0.54

Over the past year, the correlation between AMZP and MSFY has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

AMZP vs. MSFY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZP

AMZP Risk / Return Rank: 21
AMZP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
AMZP Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
AMZP Omega Ratio Rank: 22
AMZP Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
AMZP Martin Ratio Rank: 20

MSFY

MSFY Risk / Return Rank: 6
MSFY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
MSFY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
MSFY Omega Ratio Rank: 6
MSFY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
MSFY Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZP vs. MSFY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMZP	MSFY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.72	-0.27	+0.99
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.15	-0.19	+1.34
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	0.97	+0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.88	-0.21	+1.10
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.27	-0.47	+2.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMZP vs. MSFY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZP Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is higher than the MSFY Sharpe Ratio of -0.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZP and MSFY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMZP	MSFY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72	-0.27	+0.99
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	0.20	+0.67

Drawdowns

AMZP vs. MSFY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZP drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, smaller than the maximum MSFY drawdown of -34.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZP and MSFY.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMZP	MSFY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.36%	-34.21%	+6.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.64%	-34.21%	+10.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.17%	-20.53%	+10.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.02%	-7.20%	+1.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.17%	15.40%	-6.23%

Volatility

AMZP vs. MSFY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) is 8.28%, while Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF (MSFY) has a volatility of 10.84%. This indicates that AMZP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MSFY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMZP	MSFY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.28%	10.84%	-2.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.18%	25.02%	-2.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.12%	26.51%	+2.61%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.85%	22.27%	+4.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.85%	22.27%	+4.58%

AMZP vs. MSFY - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than MSFY's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMZP vs. MSFY - Dividend Comparison

AMZP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.53%, less than MSFY's 24.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF	19.53%	22.04%	15.15%	2.45%
MSFY Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF	24.31%	18.56%	14.35%	1.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMZP and MSFY in my portfolio?

AMZP and MSFY have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMZP or MSFY?

MSFY has higher volatility (10.84%) compared to AMZP (8.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZP dropped -27.36% vs MSFY's -34.21%.

Which ETF is better, AMZP or MSFY?

On 1-year performance, AMZP leads with 20.81% vs -7.25% for MSFY. On fees, AMZP is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, AMZP has been the lower-risk option at 8.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMZP or MSFY?

Over the 1-year period, AMZP has performed better with a 20.81% return vs -7.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMZP or MSFY?

AMZP is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for MSFY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMZP or MSFY?

MSFY has the higher dividend yield at 24.31%, compared with 19.53% for AMZP.

What is the main difference between AMZP and MSFY?

AMZP is categorized as Options Trading, while MSFY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZP and 1.00% for MSFY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMZP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.