AMZP vs. KGLD
AMZP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF) and KGLD (Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF ) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZP is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Kurv, while KGLD is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Kurv. Both are actively managed. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMZP charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for KGLD.
Performance
AMZP vs. KGLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZP achieves a 5.27% return, which is significantly higher than KGLD's 2.99% return.
AMZP
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- -8.93%
- YTD
- 5.27%
- 6M
- 5.85%
- 1Y
- 20.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KGLD
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- 2.99%
- 6M
- 5.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZP vs. KGLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF | 5.27% | 7.89% |
KGLD Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF | 2.99% | 29.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZP and KGLD is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2025 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZP vs. KGLD — Risk / Return Rank
AMZP
KGLD
AMZP vs. KGLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) and Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF (KGLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMZP | KGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.72 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.15 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.88 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.27 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMZP | KGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 1.32 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
AMZP vs. KGLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZP drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, which is greater than KGLD's maximum drawdown of -20.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZP and KGLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZP | KGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.36% | -20.29% | -7.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.17% | -19.40% | +9.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.02% | -6.10% | +0.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.17% | — | — |
Volatility
AMZP vs. KGLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZP | KGLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.28% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.18% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.12% | 28.72% | +0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.85% | 28.72% | -1.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.85% | 28.72% | -1.87% |
AMZP vs. KGLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than KGLD's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZP vs. KGLD - Dividend Comparison
AMZP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.53%, more than KGLD's 12.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF | 19.53% | 22.04% | 15.15% | 2.45% |
KGLD Kurv Gold Enhanced Income ETF | 12.64% | 4.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZP and KGLD have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMZP is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMZP is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for KGLD.
AMZP has the higher dividend yield at 19.53%, compared with 12.64% for KGLD.
AMZP is categorized as Options Trading, while KGLD is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZP and 1.00% for KGLD.
Find the right allocation for AMZP and KGLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer