AMZP vs. EINC
AMZP (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF) and EINC (VanEck Energy Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZP is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Kurv, while EINC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MVIS North America Energy Infrastructure Index. AMZP is actively managed, while EINC is passively managed. Over the past year, AMZP returned 23.84% vs 27.63% for EINC. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMZP charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EINC.
Performance
AMZP vs. EINC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZP achieves a 8.22% return, which is significantly lower than EINC's 25.23% return.
AMZP
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- -5.00%
- YTD
- 8.22%
- 6M
- 7.97%
- 1Y
- 23.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EINC
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -0.74%
- YTD
- 25.23%
- 6M
- 25.97%
- 1Y
- 27.63%
- 3Y*
- 29.35%
- 5Y*
- 21.20%
- 10Y*
- 11.66%
AMZP vs. EINC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF | 8.22% | 9.56% | 37.42% | 7.73% |
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 25.23% | 7.11% | 42.79% | 2.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZP and EINC is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023 | 0.04 |
The correlation between AMZP and EINC shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZP vs. EINC — Risk / Return Rank
AMZP
EINC
AMZP vs. EINC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) and VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMZP | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 1.89 | -1.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.28 | 2.56 | -1.28 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.33 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 3.70 | -2.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.71 | 10.32 | -7.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMZP | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 1.89 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.09 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.46 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 0.04 | +0.88 |
Drawdowns
AMZP vs. EINC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZP drawdown since its inception was -27.36%, smaller than the maximum EINC drawdown of -87.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZP and EINC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZP | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.36% | -87.55% | +60.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.64% | -7.89% | -15.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.87% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -68.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.65% | -5.06% | -2.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.02% | -44.30% | +38.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.15% | 2.83% | +6.32% |
Volatility
AMZP vs. EINC - Volatility Comparison
Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF (AMZP) has a higher volatility of 8.11% compared to VanEck Energy Income ETF (EINC) at 6.40%. This indicates that AMZP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EINC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZP | EINC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.11% | 6.40% | +1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.00% | 11.56% | +10.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.99% | 14.75% | +14.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.81% | 19.58% | +7.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.81% | 25.44% | +1.37% |
AMZP vs. EINC - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZP has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than EINC's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZP vs. EINC - Dividend Comparison
AMZP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.00%, more than EINC's 3.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZP Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Amazon AMZN ETF | 19.00% | 22.04% | 15.15% | 2.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EINC VanEck Energy Income ETF | 3.53% | 4.51% | 3.33% | 3.77% | 2.89% | 6.03% | 6.69% | 9.66% | 11.31% | 8.53% | 9.71% | 28.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZP and EINC have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMZP has higher volatility (8.11%) compared to EINC (6.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZP dropped -27.36% vs EINC's -87.55%.
On 1-year performance, EINC leads with 27.63% vs 23.84% for AMZP. On fees, EINC is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, EINC has been the lower-risk option at 6.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, EINC has performed better with a 27.63% return vs 23.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EINC is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMZP.
AMZP has the higher dividend yield at 19.00%, compared with 3.53% for EINC.
AMZP is categorized as Options Trading, while EINC is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Kurv and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for AMZP and 0.45% for EINC.
EINC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZP and EINC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer