AMZN vs. IXC
AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc) is a stock, while IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) is Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. Over the past 10 years, AMZN returned 21.11%/yr vs 9.23%/yr for IXC. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMZN vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZN achieves a 8.26% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 27.41% return. Over the past 10 years, AMZN has outperformed IXC with an annualized return of 21.11%, while IXC has yielded a comparatively lower 9.23% annualized return.
AMZN
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 8.26%
- 1Y
- 11.96%
- 3Y*
- 23.22%
- 5Y*
- 6.94%
- 10Y*
- 21.11%
IXC
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- 6M
- 21.42%
- YTD
- 27.41%
- 1Y
- 36.71%
- 3Y*
- 16.54%
- 5Y*
- 21.32%
- 10Y*
- 9.23%
AMZN vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 8.26% | 5.21% | 44.39% | 80.88% | -49.62% | 2.38% | 76.26% | 23.03% | 28.43% | 55.96% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 27.41% | 13.98% | 1.95% | 3.92% | 48.51% | 40.88% | -31.00% | 12.67% | -14.85% | 5.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZN and IXC is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2001 | 0.27 |
The correlation between AMZN and IXC shifts across timeframes, from -0.16 (1 year) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZN vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank
AMZN
IXC
AMZN vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMZN | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.32 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 2.40 | -1.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.21 | 7.55 | -6.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMZN vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZN drawdown since its inception was -94.40%, which is greater than IXC's maximum drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZN and IXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZN | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.40% | -67.88% | -26.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.74% | -15.36% | -6.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.88% | -19.06% | -11.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.77% | -24.93% | -30.84% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.15% | -64.16% | +8.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.13% | -8.30% | -0.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.14% | -17.45% | -10.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.88% | 4.88% | +5.00% |
Volatility
AMZN vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) has a higher volatility of 9.77% compared to iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC) at 6.19%. This indicates that AMZN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IXC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZN | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.77% | 6.19% | +3.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.03% | 15.89% | +6.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.14% | 19.32% | +11.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.70% | 23.44% | +12.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.59% | 26.81% | +5.78% |
Dividends
AMZN vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
AMZN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IXC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 2.98% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZN and IXC have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMZN has higher volatility (9.77%) compared to IXC (6.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZN dropped -94.40% vs IXC's -67.88%.
IXC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZN and IXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer