AMZN vs. GPIX
AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc) is a stock, while GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by Goldman Sachs. Over the past year, AMZN returned 14.82% vs 22.98% for GPIX. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
AMZN vs. GPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZN achieves a 6.24% return, which is significantly lower than GPIX's 8.17% return.
AMZN
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -10.07%
- YTD
- 6.24%
- 6M
- 8.08%
- 1Y
- 14.82%
- 3Y*
- 25.71%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- 21.19%
GPIX
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 8.17%
- 6M
- 8.56%
- 1Y
- 22.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZN vs. GPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 6.24% | 5.21% | 44.39% | 27.07% |
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 8.17% | 16.25% | 21.77% | 13.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZN and GPIX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2023 | 0.64 |
The correlation between AMZN and GPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZN vs. GPIX — Risk / Return Rank
AMZN
GPIX
AMZN vs. GPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMZN | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.42 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 2.99 | -2.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.64 | 14.96 | -13.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMZN | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 | 2.22 | -1.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 1.71 | -1.15 |
Drawdowns
AMZN vs. GPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZN drawdown since its inception was -94.40%, which is greater than GPIX's maximum drawdown of -17.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZN and GPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZN | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.40% | -17.50% | -76.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.74% | -7.71% | -14.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.83% | -2.06% | -8.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.12% | -1.48% | -26.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.08% | 1.54% | +7.54% |
Volatility
AMZN vs. GPIX - Volatility Comparison
Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) has a higher volatility of 7.80% compared to Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF (GPIX) at 3.07%. This indicates that AMZN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZN | GPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.80% | 3.07% | +4.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.58% | 8.22% | +12.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.13% | 10.40% | +19.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.53% | 13.84% | +21.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.48% | 13.84% | +18.64% |
Dividends
AMZN vs. GPIX - Dividend Comparison
AMZN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GPIX Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Premium Income ETF | 8.13% | 8.01% | 7.45% | 1.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZN and GPIX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMZN has higher volatility (7.80%) compared to GPIX (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZN dropped -94.40% vs GPIX's -17.50%.
GPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZN and GPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer