PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZN vs. FTNT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AMZN vs. FTNT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZN achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly lower than FTNT's 84.23% return. Over the past 10 years, AMZN has underperformed FTNT with an annualized return of 20.83%, while FTNT has yielded a comparatively higher 36.02% annualized return.


AMZN

1D
-1.23%
1M
-9.69%
YTD
3.35%
6M
5.46%
1Y
12.47%
3Y*
23.49%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
20.83%

FTNT

1D
0.85%
1M
19.16%
YTD
84.23%
6M
77.94%
1Y
45.10%
3Y*
27.56%
5Y*
26.15%
10Y*
36.02%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZN vs. FTNT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc
3.35%5.21%44.39%80.88%-49.62%2.38%76.26%23.03%28.43%55.96%
FTNT
Fortinet, Inc.
84.23%-15.95%61.42%19.72%-31.98%141.97%39.13%51.58%61.20%45.05%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZN and FTNT is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2009

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between AMZN and FTNT has dropped to 0.19 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMZN:

$2.59T

FTNT:

$108.67B

EPS

AMZN:

$8.37

FTNT:

$2.58

PE Ratio

AMZN:

28.50

FTNT:

56.81

PEG Ratio

AMZN:

0.69

FTNT:

1.58

PS Ratio

AMZN:

3.48

FTNT:

15.62

PB Ratio

AMZN:

5.87

FTNT:

109.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMZN:

$742.78B

FTNT:

$7.11B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMZN:

$348.59B

FTNT:

$5.74B

EBITDA (TTM)

AMZN:

$152.71B

FTNT:

$2.47B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZN vs. FTNT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZN
AMZN Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
AMZN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZN Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZN Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

FTNT
FTNT Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FTNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTNT Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FTNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTNT Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZN vs. FTNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMZNFTNTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.23

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.55

1.43

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.29

2.09

-0.80

AMZN vs. FTNT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZN Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the FTNT Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZN and FTNT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMZN vs. FTNT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZN drawdown since its inception was -94.40%, which is greater than FTNT's maximum drawdown of -51.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZN and FTNT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZNFTNTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.40%

-51.20%

-43.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.74%

-30.90%

+9.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.88%

-38.32%

+7.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.15%

-38.32%

-17.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.15%

-38.32%

-17.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.25%

-2.25%

-11.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.19%

-16.22%

-11.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.21%

21.07%

-11.86%

Volatility

AMZN vs. FTNT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) is 7.92%, while Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) has a volatility of 13.35%. This indicates that AMZN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZNFTNTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.92%

13.35%

-5.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.73%

31.79%

-11.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.13%

45.18%

-15.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.53%

43.94%

-8.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.48%

40.88%

-8.40%

Dividends

AMZN vs. FTNT - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMZN nor FTNT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

AMZN vs. FTNT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amazon.com, Inc and Fortinet, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
181.52B
1.85B
(AMZN) Total Revenue
(FTNT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AMZN vs. FTNT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Amazon.com, Inc and Fortinet, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
36.8%
80.3%
Portfolio components
AMZN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a gross profit of 66.77B and revenue of 181.52B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.

FTNT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortinet, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.49B and revenue of 1.85B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 80.3%.

AMZN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported an operating income of 23.85B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.1%.

FTNT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortinet, Inc. reported an operating income of 580.00M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.4%.

AMZN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Amazon.com, Inc reported a net income of 30.26B and revenue of 181.52B, resulting in a net margin of 16.7%.

FTNT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortinet, Inc. reported a net income of 534.50M and revenue of 1.85B, resulting in a net margin of 28.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AMZN and FTNT have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTNT has higher volatility (13.35%) compared to AMZN (7.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZN dropped -94.40% vs FTNT's -51.20%.

FTNT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.98 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZN and FTNT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer