AMZN vs. CGL.TO
AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc) is a stock, while CGL.TO (iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged)) is Gold fund tracking the Gold Bullion. Over the past 10 years, AMZN returned 20.83%/yr vs 10.05%/yr for CGL.TO. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMZN vs. CGL.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AMZN is traded in USD, while CGL.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CGL.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZN achieves a 3.35% return, which is significantly higher than CGL.TO's -5.12% return. Over the past 10 years, AMZN has outperformed CGL.TO with an annualized return of 20.83%, while CGL.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.05% annualized return.
AMZN
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -9.69%
- YTD
- 3.35%
- 6M
- 5.46%
- 1Y
- 12.47%
- 3Y*
- 23.49%
- 5Y*
- 7.35%
- 10Y*
- 20.83%
CGL.TO
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -11.35%
- YTD
- -5.12%
- 6M
- -4.61%
- 1Y
- 16.70%
- 3Y*
- 25.29%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- 10.05%
AMZN vs. CGL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZN Amazon.com, Inc | 3.35% | 5.21% | 44.39% | 80.88% | -49.62% | 2.38% | 76.26% | 23.03% | 28.43% | 55.96% |
CGL.TO iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) | -5.12% | 67.73% | 15.88% | 13.97% | -6.96% | -4.54% | 26.41% | 21.59% | -10.70% | 19.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZN and CGL.TO is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2010 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZN vs. CGL.TO — Risk / Return Rank
AMZN
CGL.TO
AMZN vs. CGL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CGL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMZN | CGL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.14 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 0.70 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.29 | 2.00 | -0.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMZN vs. CGL.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZN drawdown since its inception was -94.40%, which is greater than CGL.TO's maximum drawdown of -62.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZN and CGL.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZN | CGL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.40% | -62.05% | -32.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.74% | -27.17% | +5.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.88% | -27.17% | -3.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.15% | -27.17% | -28.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.15% | -27.17% | -28.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.25% | -24.91% | +11.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.19% | -32.74% | +4.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.21% | 9.43% | -0.22% |
Volatility
AMZN vs. CGL.TO - Volatility Comparison
Amazon.com, Inc (AMZN) and iShares Gold Bullion ETF (CAD-Hedged) (CGL.TO) have volatilities of 7.92% and 7.69%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZN | CGL.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.92% | 7.69% | +0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.73% | 24.50% | -3.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.13% | 28.25% | +1.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.53% | 19.70% | +15.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.48% | 17.92% | +14.56% |
Dividends
AMZN vs. CGL.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMZN nor CGL.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZN and CGL.TO have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for AMZN and CGL.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer