AMZN.TO vs. ZDV.TO
AMZN.TO (Amazon.com CDR (CAD Hedged)) is a stock, while ZDV.TO (BMO Canadian Dividend ETF) is Canada Equities fund actively managed by BMO. Over the past year, AMZN.TO returned 18.64% vs 31.08% for ZDV.TO. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMZN.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZN.TO achieves a 7.31% return, which is significantly lower than ZDV.TO's 18.56% return.
AMZN.TO
- 1D
- -2.77%
- 1M
- -8.08%
- YTD
- 7.31%
- 6M
- 6.48%
- 1Y
- 18.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZDV.TO
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 4.61%
- YTD
- 18.56%
- 6M
- 13.14%
- 1Y
- 31.08%
- 3Y*
- 20.39%
- 5Y*
- 13.72%
- 10Y*
- 10.97%
AMZN.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMZN.TO Amazon.com CDR (CAD Hedged) | 7.31% | -4.32% |
ZDV.TO BMO Canadian Dividend ETF | 18.56% | 17.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZN.TO and ZDV.TO is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2025 | 0.21 |
The correlation between AMZN.TO and ZDV.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZN.TO vs. ZDV.TO — Risk / Return Rank
AMZN.TO
ZDV.TO
AMZN.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amazon.com CDR (CAD Hedged) (AMZN.TO) and BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (ZDV.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMZN.TO | ZDV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.66 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.85 | 4.69 | -3.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.01 | 18.24 | -16.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMZN.TO | ZDV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 | 2.95 | -2.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.73 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | 0.68 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
AMZN.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZN.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.30%, smaller than the maximum ZDV.TO drawdown of -43.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZN.TO and ZDV.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZN.TO | ZDV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.30% | -43.21% | +12.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.10% | -6.65% | -15.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.04% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.07% | -0.22% | -8.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.71% | -5.12% | -5.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.30% | 1.71% | +7.59% |
Volatility
AMZN.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Volatility Comparison
Amazon.com CDR (CAD Hedged) (AMZN.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.41% compared to BMO Canadian Dividend ETF (ZDV.TO) at 2.49%. This indicates that AMZN.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZDV.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZN.TO | ZDV.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.41% | 2.49% | +4.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.99% | 9.69% | +10.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.36% | 10.57% | +18.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.28% | 10.94% | +22.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.28% | 15.11% | +18.17% |
Dividends
AMZN.TO vs. ZDV.TO - Dividend Comparison
AMZN.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZDV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.68%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMZN.TO Amazon.com CDR (CAD Hedged) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ZDV.TO BMO Canadian Dividend ETF | 2.68% | 3.07% | 3.57% | 4.10% | 4.10% | 3.63% | 4.48% | 4.11% | 5.06% | 3.96% | 3.84% | 4.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZN.TO and ZDV.TO have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for AMZN.TO and ZDV.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer