AMZI.L vs. CEGI.L
AMZI.L (IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP) and CEGI.L (REX Crypto Equity Income & Growth UCITS ETF Distributing) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMZI.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CEGI.L.
Performance
AMZI.L vs. CEGI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZI.L achieves a -5.34% return, which is significantly lower than CEGI.L's 28.80% return.
AMZI.L
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -6.72%
- YTD
- -5.34%
- 6M
- -3.29%
- 1Y
- 0.52%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CEGI.L
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 7.30%
- YTD
- 28.80%
- 6M
- 22.83%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZI.L vs. CEGI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMZI.L IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP | -5.34% | 2.40% |
CEGI.L REX Crypto Equity Income & Growth UCITS ETF Distributing | 28.80% | 18.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZI.L and CEGI.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 2025 | 0.38 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZI.L vs. CEGI.L — Risk / Return Rank
AMZI.L
CEGI.L
AMZI.L vs. CEGI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP (AMZI.L) and REX Crypto Equity Income & Growth UCITS ETF Distributing (CEGI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMZI.L | CEGI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.12 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.28 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMZI.L | CEGI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 1.70 | -1.42 |
Drawdowns
AMZI.L vs. CEGI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZI.L drawdown since its inception was -27.38%, roughly equal to the maximum CEGI.L drawdown of -27.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZI.L and CEGI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZI.L | CEGI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.38% | -27.98% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.38% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.85% | -2.12% | -9.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.87% | -9.94% | +1.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.82% | — | — |
Volatility
AMZI.L vs. CEGI.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZI.L | CEGI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.25% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.61% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.88% | 33.97% | -5.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.12% | 33.97% | -4.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.12% | 33.97% | -4.85% |
AMZI.L vs. CEGI.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than CEGI.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZI.L vs. CEGI.L - Dividend Comparison
AMZI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.95%, more than CEGI.L's 13.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AMZI.L IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP | 15.95% | 13.65% | 2.45% |
CEGI.L REX Crypto Equity Income & Growth UCITS ETF Distributing | 13.74% | 9.50% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZI.L and CEGI.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMZI.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMZI.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CEGI.L.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and REX. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AMZI.L and 0.65% for CEGI.L.
Find the right allocation for AMZI.L and CEGI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer