AMZD.L vs. QQQO.L
AMZD.L (IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP) and QQQO.L (IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP) are both exchange-traded funds - AMZD.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while QQQO.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMZD.L returned 5.34% vs 33.32% for QQQO.L. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMZD.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for QQQO.L.
Performance
AMZD.L vs. QQQO.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZD.L achieves a -4.23% return, which is significantly lower than QQQO.L's 15.53% return.
AMZD.L
- 1D
- 2.29%
- 1M
- -5.35%
- YTD
- -4.23%
- 6M
- -2.22%
- 1Y
- 5.34%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQO.L
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- 6.84%
- YTD
- 15.53%
- 6M
- 14.50%
- 1Y
- 33.32%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZD.L vs. QQQO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AMZD.L IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP | -4.23% | -2.75% | 23.09% |
QQQO.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP | 15.53% | 6.57% | 11.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZD.L and QQQO.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2024 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZD.L vs. QQQO.L — Risk / Return Rank
AMZD.L
QQQO.L
AMZD.L vs. QQQO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP (AMZD.L) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMZD.L | QQQO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.46 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 4.71 | -4.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.41 | 11.27 | -10.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMZD.L | QQQO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 | 2.37 | -2.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 1.18 | -0.88 |
Drawdowns
AMZD.L vs. QQQO.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZD.L drawdown since its inception was -29.73%, which is greater than QQQO.L's maximum drawdown of -21.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZD.L and QQQO.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZD.L | QQQO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.73% | -21.70% | -8.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.42% | -7.04% | -21.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.62% | -0.66% | -13.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.19% | -4.40% | -7.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.16% | 2.95% | +10.21% |
Volatility
AMZD.L vs. QQQO.L - Volatility Comparison
IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP (AMZD.L) has a higher volatility of 8.39% compared to IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP (QQQO.L) at 3.90%. This indicates that AMZD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQO.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZD.L | QQQO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.39% | 3.90% | +4.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.84% | 8.93% | +12.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.01% | 14.00% | +14.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.25% | 17.34% | +10.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.25% | 17.34% | +10.91% |
AMZD.L vs. QQQO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZD.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQO.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZD.L vs. QQQO.L - Dividend Comparison
AMZD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.80%, less than QQQO.L's 67.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AMZD.L IncomeShares Amazon (AMZN) Options ETP GBP | 15.80% | 14.03% | 2.37% |
QQQO.L IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP GBP | 67.52% | 124.53% | 17.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZD.L and QQQO.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQO.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQO.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for AMZD.L.
AMZD.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQO.L is Nasdaq-100. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AMZD.L and 0.45% for QQQO.L.
Find the right allocation for AMZD.L and QQQO.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer