AMYY vs. PBTP
AMYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF) and PBTP (Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while PBTP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA U.S. Treasuries Inflation-Linked (0-5 Y). AMYY is actively managed, while PBTP is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.16, they often move in opposite directions. AMYY charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for PBTP.
Performance
AMYY vs. PBTP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMYY achieves a 7.93% return, which is significantly higher than PBTP's 2.15% return.
AMYY
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 9.36%
- YTD
- 7.93%
- 6M
- 13.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBTP
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 2.15%
- 6M
- 2.14%
- 1Y
- 4.68%
- 3Y*
- 5.23%
- 5Y*
- 3.32%
- 10Y*
- —
AMYY vs. PBTP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF | 7.93% | 20.39% |
PBTP Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF | 2.15% | 0.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMYY and PBTP is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2025 | -0.16 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMYY vs. PBTP — Risk / Return Rank
AMYY
PBTP
AMYY vs. PBTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF (AMYY) and Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMYY | PBTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.74 | 1.30 | +0.44 |
Drawdowns
AMYY vs. PBTP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMYY drawdown since its inception was -16.91%, which is greater than PBTP's maximum drawdown of -5.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMYY and PBTP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMYY | PBTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.91% | -5.44% | -11.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -5.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.02% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.51% | -0.75% | -4.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.19% | — |
Volatility
AMYY vs. PBTP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMYY | PBTP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 1.03% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.74% | 1.54% | +24.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.74% | 2.85% | +22.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.74% | 2.64% | +23.10% |
AMYY vs. PBTP - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PBTP's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMYY vs. PBTP - Dividend Comparison
AMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 81.55%, more than PBTP's 3.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF | 81.55% | 30.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBTP Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF | 3.10% | 3.82% | 2.59% | 2.36% | 5.33% | 3.12% | 1.25% | 2.12% | 2.33% | 0.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMYY and PBTP have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PBTP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PBTP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for AMYY.
AMYY has the higher dividend yield at 81.55%, compared with 3.10% for PBTP.
AMYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while PBTP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for AMYY and 0.07% for PBTP.
Find the right allocation for AMYY and PBTP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer