PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMYY vs. MBNE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMYY vs. MBNE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF (AMYY) and SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ESG ETF (MBNE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMYY achieves a 7.66% return, which is significantly higher than MBNE's 0.84% return.


AMYY

1D
-0.18%
1M
-2.45%
6M
18.04%
YTD
7.66%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

MBNE

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
0.04%
YTD
0.84%
1Y
4.17%
3Y*
3.05%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$403.40K$326.63K$353.65K
$0.00$0.00$13.22K

AMYY vs. MBNE - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AMYY and MBNE is -0.05, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025

-0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMYY vs. MBNE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMYY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


MBNE
MBNE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
MBNE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBNE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBNE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
MBNE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBNE Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMYY vs. MBNE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF (AMYY) and SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ESG ETF (MBNE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMYYMBNEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.58

AMYY vs. MBNE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMYY vs. MBNE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMYY drawdown since its inception was -16.91%, which is greater than MBNE's maximum drawdown of -6.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMYY and MBNE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMYYMBNEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.91%

-6.19%

-10.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.45%

-1.04%

-1.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.77%

-1.39%

-3.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.75%

Volatility

AMYY vs. MBNE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMYYMBNEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.07%

2.46%

+21.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.07%

3.62%

+20.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.07%

3.62%

+20.45%

AMYY vs. MBNE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMYY has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than MBNE's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMYY vs. MBNE - Dividend Comparison

AMYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 108.53%, more than MBNE's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
AMYY
GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMD ETF
108.53%30.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MBNE
SPDR Nuveen Municipal Bond ESG ETF
2.54%3.63%3.32%3.01%1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMYY and MBNE have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MBNE is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MBNE is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for AMYY.

AMYY has the higher dividend yield at 108.53%, compared with 2.54% for MBNE.

AMYY is categorized as Derivative Income, while MBNE is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for AMYY and 0.43% for MBNE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMYY and MBNE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer