AMUU vs. PBTP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AMUU (Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares) and PBTP (Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMUU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Direxion, while PBTP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA U.S. Treasuries Inflation-Linked (0-5 Y). AMUU is actively managed, while PBTP is passively managed. Over the past year, AMUU returned 1186.28% vs 4.68% for PBTP. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. AMUU charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for PBTP.

Performance

AMUU vs. PBTP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) and Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMUU achieves a 393.28% return, which is significantly higher than PBTP's 2.15% return.

AMUU

• 1D: 7.59%
• 1M: 134.67%
• YTD: 393.28%
• 6M: 368.74%
• 1Y: 1,186.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PBTP

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 2.15%
• 6M: 2.14%
• 1Y: 4.68%
• 3Y*: 5.23%
• 5Y*: 3.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMUU vs. PBTP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AMUU Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares	393.28%	145.24%
PBTP Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF	2.15%	4.93%

Correlation

The correlation between AMUU and PBTP is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025	-0.14

AMUU vs. PBTP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMUU	PBTP
Technology	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.0%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

AMUU vs. PBTP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMUU

AMUU Risk / Return Rank: 96
AMUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
AMUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
AMUU Omega Ratio Rank: 92
AMUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
AMUU Martin Ratio Rank: 97

PBTP

PBTP Risk / Return Rank: 93
PBTP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
PBTP Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
PBTP Omega Ratio Rank: 93
PBTP Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
PBTP Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMUU vs. PBTP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) and Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMUU	PBTP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	9.25	3.05	+6.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.79	5.10	-0.31
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	1.66	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	21.30	7.08	+14.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	41.74	24.51	+17.23
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMUU vs. PBTP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMUU Sharpe Ratio is 9.25, which is higher than the PBTP Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMUU and PBTP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMUU	PBTP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.25	3.05	+6.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.17	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.45	1.30	+3.14

Drawdowns

AMUU vs. PBTP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMUU drawdown since its inception was -56.47%, which is greater than PBTP's maximum drawdown of -5.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMUU and PBTP.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMUU	PBTP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.47%	-5.44%	-51.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.31%	-0.66%	-55.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.03%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-5.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.02%	+0.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.84%	-0.75%	-22.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	28.68%	0.19%	+28.49%

Volatility

AMUU vs. PBTP - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) has a higher volatility of 45.72% compared to Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF (PBTP) at 0.40%. This indicates that AMUU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBTP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMUU	PBTP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	45.72%	0.40%	+45.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	94.24%	1.03%	+93.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	129.66%	1.54%	+128.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	131.28%	2.85%	+128.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	131.28%	2.64%	+128.64%

AMUU vs. PBTP - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMUU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than PBTP's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMUU vs. PBTP - Dividend Comparison

AMUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than PBTP's 3.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AMUU Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares	2.83%	13.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PBTP Invesco PureBeta 0-5 Yr US TIPS ETF	3.10%	3.82%	2.59%	2.36%	5.33%	3.12%	1.25%	2.12%	2.33%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMUU and PBTP in my portfolio?

AMUU and PBTP have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMUU or PBTP?

AMUU has higher volatility (45.72%) compared to PBTP (0.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMUU dropped -56.47% vs PBTP's -5.44%.

Which ETF is better, AMUU or PBTP?

On 1-year performance, AMUU leads with 1186.28% vs 4.68% for PBTP. On fees, PBTP is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, PBTP has been the lower-risk option at 0.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMUU or PBTP?

Over the 1-year period, AMUU has performed better with a 1186.28% return vs 4.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMUU or PBTP?

PBTP is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for AMUU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMUU or PBTP?

PBTP has the higher dividend yield at 3.10%, compared with 2.83% for AMUU.

What is the main difference between AMUU and PBTP?

AMUU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while PBTP is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for AMUU and 0.07% for PBTP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.25 vs 3.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.