PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMUU vs. IBID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMUU vs. IBID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMUU achieves a 393.28% return, which is significantly higher than IBID's 2.46% return.


AMUU

1D
7.59%
1M
134.67%
YTD
393.28%
6M
368.74%
1Y
1,186.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBID

1D
0.08%
1M
0.49%
YTD
2.46%
6M
2.57%
1Y
4.83%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMUU vs. IBID - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AMUU and IBID is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 13, 2025

-0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMUU vs. IBID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMUU
AMUU Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AMUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMUU Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
AMUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMUU Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

IBID
IBID Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IBID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBID Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBID Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
IBID Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBID Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMUU vs. IBID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) and iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMUUIBIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.63

1.94

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

21.30

13.33

+7.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

41.74

39.52

+2.22

AMUU vs. IBID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMUU Sharpe Ratio is 9.25, which is higher than the IBID Sharpe Ratio of 3.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMUU and IBID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMUUIBIDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.25

3.91

+5.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.45

2.56

+1.89

Drawdowns

AMUU vs. IBID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMUU drawdown since its inception was -56.47%, which is greater than IBID's maximum drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMUU and IBID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMUUIBIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.47%

-1.28%

-55.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.31%

-0.36%

-55.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.84%

-0.22%

-22.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.68%

0.12%

+28.56%

Volatility

AMUU vs. IBID - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares (AMUU) has a higher volatility of 45.72% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF (IBID) at 0.32%. This indicates that AMUU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMUUIBIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

45.72%

0.32%

+45.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

94.24%

0.80%

+93.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

129.66%

1.25%

+128.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

131.28%

2.25%

+129.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

131.28%

2.25%

+129.03%

AMUU vs. IBID - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMUU has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than IBID's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMUU vs. IBID - Dividend Comparison

AMUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, less than IBID's 3.66% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AMUU
Direxion Daily AMD Bull 2X Shares
2.83%13.58%0.00%0.00%
IBID
iShares iBonds Oct 2027 Term TIPS ETF
3.66%4.43%4.24%0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMUU and IBID have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMUU has higher volatility (45.72%) compared to IBID (0.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMUU dropped -56.47% vs IBID's -1.28%.

On 1-year performance, AMUU leads with 1186.28% vs 4.83% for IBID. On fees, IBID is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBID has been the lower-risk option at 0.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AMUU has performed better with a 1186.28% return vs 4.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBID is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for AMUU.

IBID has the higher dividend yield at 3.66%, compared with 2.83% for AMUU.

AMUU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IBID is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for AMUU and 0.10% for IBID.

AMUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (9.25 vs 3.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMUU and IBID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer