AMUN vs. USCI
AMUN (abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF) and USCI (United States Commodity Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - AMUN is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by abrdn, while USCI is a Commodities fund tracking the SummerHaven Dynamic Commodity Index Total Return. AMUN is actively managed, while USCI is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. AMUN charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for USCI.
Performance
AMUN vs. USCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMUN achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly lower than USCI's 27.35% return.
AMUN
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
USCI
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- 5.16%
- 6M
- 21.95%
- YTD
- 27.35%
- 1Y
- 33.06%
- 3Y*
- 21.21%
- 5Y*
- 19.56%
- 10Y*
- 8.69%
AMUN vs. USCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF | 1.40% | 0.14% |
USCI United States Commodity Index Fund | 27.35% | 1.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMUN and USCI is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2025 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMUN vs. USCI — Risk / Return Rank
AMUN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
USCI
AMUN vs. USCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF (AMUN) and United States Commodity Index Fund (USCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMUN | USCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.33 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.97 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.37 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMUN vs. USCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMUN drawdown since its inception was -0.61%, smaller than the maximum USCI drawdown of -66.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMUN and USCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMUN | USCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.61% | -66.41% | +65.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.19% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -3.75% | +3.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -29.34% | +29.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.54% | — |
Volatility
AMUN vs. USCI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMUN | USCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.21% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.33% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95% | 17.01% | -16.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.95% | 18.43% | -17.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.95% | 15.89% | -14.94% |
AMUN vs. USCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMUN has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than USCI's 1.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMUN vs. USCI - Dividend Comparison
AMUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, while USCI has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF | 2.13% | 0.66% |
USCI United States Commodity Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMUN and USCI have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMUN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMUN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.03% for USCI.
AMUN has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.00% for USCI.
AMUN is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while USCI is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and United States Commodity Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AMUN and 1.03% for USCI.
Find the right allocation for AMUN and USCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer