AMUN vs. HYHG
AMUN (abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF) and HYHG (ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged) are both exchange-traded funds - AMUN is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by abrdn, while HYHG is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Citi High Yield (Treasury Rate-Hedged) Index. AMUN is actively managed, while HYHG is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. AMUN charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for HYHG.
Performance
AMUN vs. HYHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMUN achieves a 1.25% return, which is significantly lower than HYHG's 3.86% return.
AMUN
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.25%
- 6M
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HYHG
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 3.86%
- 6M
- 4.29%
- 1Y
- 8.04%
- 3Y*
- 9.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.04%
- 10Y*
- 6.38%
AMUN vs. HYHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF | 1.25% | 0.14% |
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 3.86% | 1.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMUN and HYHG is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2025 | -0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMUN vs. HYHG — Risk / Return Rank
AMUN
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
HYHG
AMUN vs. HYHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF (AMUN) and ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged (HYHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMUN | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.00 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.36 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMUN vs. HYHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMUN drawdown since its inception was -0.61%, smaller than the maximum HYHG drawdown of -25.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMUN and HYHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMUN | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.61% | -25.71% | +25.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -7.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.08% | -3.03% | +2.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.60% | — |
Volatility
AMUN vs. HYHG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMUN | HYHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 4.36% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98% | 5.57% | -4.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.98% | 8.17% | -7.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.98% | 9.10% | -8.12% |
AMUN vs. HYHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMUN has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than HYHG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMUN vs. HYHG - Dividend Comparison
AMUN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than HYHG's 6.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMUN abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Active ETF | 1.88% | 0.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HYHG ProShares High Yield-Interest Rate Hedged | 6.73% | 6.97% | 6.57% | 6.07% | 5.58% | 4.54% | 5.21% | 6.06% | 6.45% | 5.57% | 5.37% | 6.37% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMUN and HYHG have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMUN is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMUN is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HYHG.
HYHG has the higher dividend yield at 6.73%, compared with 1.88% for AMUN.
AMUN is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while HYHG is High Yield Bonds. They also come from different issuers: abrdn and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AMUN and 0.50% for HYHG.
Find the right allocation for AMUN and HYHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer