PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMTR vs. HDLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMTR vs. HDLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR) and ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AMTR

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HDLB

1D
-1.72%
1M
-4.18%
YTD
9.69%
6M
8.78%
1Y
17.78%
3Y*
26.82%
5Y*
11.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMTR vs. HDLB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AMTR
ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN
0.00%0.00%44.68%12.75%20.41%36.99%15.24%
HDLB
ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B
9.69%27.26%28.21%-4.12%-11.46%62.67%31.00%

Correlation

The correlation between AMTR and HDLB is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2020

0.48

The correlation between AMTR and HDLB shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (3 years) to 0.48 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMTR vs. HDLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMTR

HDLB
HDLB Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
HDLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HDLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
HDLB Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
HDLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
HDLB Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMTR vs. HDLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN (AMTR) and ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B (HDLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AMTR vs. HDLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMTRHDLBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

Drawdowns

AMTR vs. HDLB - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMTRHDLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.62%

Volatility

AMTR vs. HDLB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMTRHDLBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

43.58%

AMTR vs. HDLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMTR has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than HDLB's 1.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMTR vs. HDLB - Dividend Comparison

AMTR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HDLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.13%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AMTR
ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Total Return Index ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
HDLB
ETRACS Monthly Pay 2xLeveraged US High Dividend Low Volatility ETN Series B
12.13%12.20%10.09%12.36%10.86%8.07%16.23%0.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMTR and HDLB have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMTR is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMTR is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.65% for HDLB.

HDLB has the higher dividend yield at 12.13%, compared with 0.00% for AMTR.

AMTR is categorized as MLPs, while HDLB is Leveraged Equities. AMTR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Index, while HDLB tracks Solactive US High Dividend Low Volatility (USD)(TR) (200%). Their fees differ too: 0.75% for AMTR and 1.65% for HDLB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMTR and HDLB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer