AMSC vs. EMEQ
AMSC (American Superconductor Corporation) is a stock, while EMEQ (Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF) is Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Nomura. Over the past year, AMSC returned -48.34% vs 107.90% for EMEQ. Their 0.46 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
AMSC vs. EMEQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMSC achieves a 2.05% return, which is significantly lower than EMEQ's 53.76% return.
AMSC
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -26.43%
- 6M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- 2.05%
- 1Y
- -48.34%
- 3Y*
- 22.11%
- 5Y*
- 15.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.68%
- ALL TIME*
- -3.05%
EMEQ
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -11.21%
- 6M
- 30.45%
- YTD
- 53.76%
- 1Y
- 107.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 65.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $27.27M | $25.36M | $48.11M | |
| $8.75M | $9.16M | $11.52M |
AMSC vs. EMEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 2.05% | 16.85% | 31.50% |
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 53.76% | 69.78% | -0.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMSC and EMEQ is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2024 | 0.46 |
The correlation between AMSC and EMEQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (all time) to 0.57 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMSC vs. EMEQ — Risk / Return Rank
AMSC
EMEQ
AMSC vs. EMEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) and Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMSC | EMEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.43 | -0.49 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | 4.13 | -4.93 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | 15.08 | -16.29 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMSC vs. EMEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMSC drawdown since its inception was -99.57%, which is greater than EMEQ's maximum drawdown of -26.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMSC and EMEQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMSC | EMEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.57% | -26.25% | -73.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.08% | -26.25% | -34.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -95.76% | -20.86% | -74.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -75.83% | -4.67% | -71.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 40.10% | 7.18% | +32.92% |
Volatility
AMSC vs. EMEQ - Volatility Comparison
American Superconductor Corporation (AMSC) has a higher volatility of 22.38% compared to Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EMEQ) at 14.87%. This indicates that AMSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMSC | EMEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.38% | 14.87% | +7.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.61% | 37.54% | +20.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.44% | 40.39% | +47.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 87.66% | 34.15% | +53.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.49% | 34.15% | +45.34% |
Dividends
AMSC vs. EMEQ - Dividend Comparison
AMSC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AMSC American Superconductor Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EMEQ Nomura Focused Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 1.79% | 2.76% | 0.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMSC and EMEQ have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMSC has higher volatility (22.38%) compared to EMEQ (14.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMSC dropped -99.57% vs EMEQ's -26.25%.
EMEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs -0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMSC and EMEQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer