PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMRGX vs. USGLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMRGX vs. USGLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX) and John Hancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth Fund (USGLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMRGX achieves a 16.33% return, which is significantly higher than USGLX's -0.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AMRGX having a 12.04% annualized return and USGLX not far behind at 11.80%.


AMRGX

1D
-0.50%
1M
4.86%
YTD
16.33%
6M
15.65%
1Y
36.05%
3Y*
18.82%
5Y*
10.09%
10Y*
12.04%

USGLX

1D
0.88%
1M
3.16%
YTD
-0.53%
6M
1.14%
1Y
1.87%
3Y*
11.02%
5Y*
4.13%
10Y*
11.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMRGX vs. USGLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMRGX
American Growth Fund Series One
16.33%11.18%16.61%24.38%-19.93%15.64%18.65%36.73%-9.07%13.37%
USGLX
John Hancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth Fund
-0.53%2.94%18.17%29.14%-29.76%19.18%35.40%33.07%3.35%25.38%

Correlation

The correlation between AMRGX and USGLX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 1996

0.75

The correlation between AMRGX and USGLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.82 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMRGX vs. USGLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMRGX
AMRGX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
AMRGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMRGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMRGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
AMRGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMRGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

USGLX
USGLX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
USGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
USGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
USGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
USGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMRGX vs. USGLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX) and John Hancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth Fund (USGLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMRGXUSGLXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

0.18

+1.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.13

0.33

+1.80

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.04

+0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

0.14

+2.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.61

0.42

+6.19

AMRGX vs. USGLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMRGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is higher than the USGLX Sharpe Ratio of 0.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMRGX and USGLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMRGXUSGLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

0.18

+1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.20

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

0.58

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.51

-0.39

Drawdowns

AMRGX vs. USGLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMRGX drawdown since its inception was -80.32%, which is greater than USGLX's maximum drawdown of -46.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMRGX and USGLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMRGXUSGLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.32%

-46.82%

-33.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.98%

-16.11%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.15%

-25.58%

+4.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.42%

-36.80%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.42%

-36.80%

+1.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.36%

-11.44%

+10.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.25%

-7.40%

-32.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.66%

5.52%

+0.14%

Volatility

AMRGX vs. USGLX - Volatility Comparison

American Growth Fund Series One (AMRGX) has a higher volatility of 8.02% compared to John Hancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth Fund (USGLX) at 2.54%. This indicates that AMRGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USGLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMRGXUSGLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.02%

2.54%

+5.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.94%

10.04%

+14.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.90%

13.31%

+13.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.20%

20.99%

+1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.49%

20.26%

+1.23%

AMRGX vs. USGLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMRGX has a 4.07% expense ratio, which is higher than USGLX's 1.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMRGX vs. USGLX - Dividend Comparison

AMRGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.32%, less than USGLX's 28.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMRGX
American Growth Fund Series One
15.32%17.82%12.39%8.17%7.77%12.21%2.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USGLX
John Hancock U.S. Global Leaders Growth Fund
28.53%28.38%15.79%0.00%0.00%8.75%11.38%6.76%13.55%7.34%5.42%6.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMRGX and USGLX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMRGX has higher volatility (8.02%) compared to USGLX (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMRGX dropped -80.32% vs USGLX's -46.82%.

AMRGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMRGX and USGLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer