PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMNF vs. ENSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AMNF vs. ENSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Armanino Foods of Distinction, Inc (AMNF) and The Ensign Group, Inc. (ENSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMNF achieves a -4.62% return, which is significantly higher than ENSG's -9.97% return. Over the past 10 years, AMNF has underperformed ENSG with an annualized return of 20.40%, while ENSG has yielded a comparatively higher 24.12% annualized return.


AMNF

1D
0.30%
1M
-0.83%
YTD
-4.62%
6M
-7.71%
1Y
29.30%
3Y*
37.56%
5Y*
27.94%
10Y*
20.40%

ENSG

1D
2.04%
1M
-8.82%
YTD
-9.97%
6M
-12.37%
1Y
2.26%
3Y*
20.14%
5Y*
13.20%
10Y*
24.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMNF vs. ENSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMNF
Armanino Foods of Distinction, Inc
-4.62%38.12%72.27%36.96%13.50%32.98%-24.90%26.37%15.03%18.37%
ENSG
The Ensign Group, Inc.
-9.97%31.33%18.62%18.89%12.98%15.43%61.43%25.53%75.67%0.78%

Correlation

The correlation between AMNF and ENSG is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2007

0.05

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMNF:

$317.00M

ENSG:

$9.34B

EPS

AMNF:

$0.63

ENSG:

$6.15

PE Ratio

AMNF:

16.16

ENSG:

25.50

PEG Ratio

AMNF:

0.44

ENSG:

1.69

PS Ratio

AMNF:

4.09

ENSG:

1.76

PB Ratio

AMNF:

6.81

ENSG:

3.95

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMNF:

$77.51M

ENSG:

$5.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMNF:

$33.91M

ENSG:

$800.38M

EBITDA (TTM)

AMNF:

$19.67M

ENSG:

$590.49M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMNF vs. ENSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMNF
AMNF Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
AMNF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMNF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMNF Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
AMNF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMNF Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

ENSG
ENSG Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
ENSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENSG Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
ENSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENSG Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMNF vs. ENSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Armanino Foods of Distinction, Inc (AMNF) and The Ensign Group, Inc. (ENSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMNFENSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.04

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

0.07

+1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.40

0.23

+3.17

AMNF vs. ENSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMNF Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the ENSG Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMNF and ENSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMNF vs. ENSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMNF drawdown since its inception was -45.54%, smaller than the maximum ENSG drawdown of -55.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMNF and ENSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMNFENSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.54%

-55.57%

+10.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.83%

-31.81%

+13.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.83%

-31.81%

+13.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.83%

-31.81%

+13.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.27%

-55.57%

+11.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.18%

-27.34%

+11.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.83%

-12.28%

+4.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.63%

9.93%

-1.30%

Volatility

AMNF vs. ENSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Armanino Foods of Distinction, Inc (AMNF) is 6.88%, while The Ensign Group, Inc. (ENSG) has a volatility of 12.22%. This indicates that AMNF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMNFENSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.88%

12.22%

-5.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.37%

23.00%

-4.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.65%

28.51%

-0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.59%

26.78%

-4.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.12%

36.10%

-12.98%

Dividends

AMNF vs. ENSG - Dividend Comparison

AMNF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, more than ENSG's 0.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMNF
Armanino Foods of Distinction, Inc
1.87%1.55%3.05%2.06%4.11%2.35%3.15%2.86%3.16%3.12%3.53%3.74%
ENSG
The Ensign Group, Inc.
0.16%0.14%0.18%0.21%0.24%0.25%0.28%0.40%0.47%0.78%0.73%0.67%

Financials

AMNF vs. ENSG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Armanino Foods of Distinction, Inc and The Ensign Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20222023202420252026
18.39M
1.39B
(AMNF) Total Revenue
(ENSG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AMNF vs. ENSG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Armanino Foods of Distinction, Inc and The Ensign Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
43.0%
21.1%
Portfolio components
AMNF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Armanino Foods of Distinction, Inc reported a gross profit of 7.91M and revenue of 18.39M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.0%.

ENSG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Ensign Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 293.37M and revenue of 1.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.1%.

AMNF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Armanino Foods of Distinction, Inc reported an operating income of 6.12M and revenue of 18.39M, resulting in an operating margin of 33.3%.

ENSG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Ensign Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 124.85M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.0%.

AMNF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Armanino Foods of Distinction, Inc reported a net income of 4.74M and revenue of 18.39M, resulting in a net margin of 25.8%.

ENSG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, The Ensign Group, Inc. reported a net income of 99.67M and revenue of 1.39B, resulting in a net margin of 7.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AMNF and ENSG have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ENSG has higher volatility (12.22%) compared to AMNF (6.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMNF dropped -45.54% vs ENSG's -55.57%.

AMNF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMNF and ENSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer