PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMLP vs. THQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMLP vs. THQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund (THQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMLP achieves a 16.62% return, which is significantly higher than THQ's -2.45% return. Over the past 10 years, AMLP has underperformed THQ with an annualized return of 6.79%, while THQ has yielded a comparatively higher 9.21% annualized return.


AMLP

1D
1.03%
1M
0.25%
YTD
16.62%
6M
16.20%
1Y
19.16%
3Y*
20.25%
5Y*
17.03%
10Y*
6.79%

THQ

1D
-3.21%
1M
-3.27%
YTD
-2.45%
6M
0.36%
1Y
9.16%
3Y*
9.10%
5Y*
3.43%
10Y*
9.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMLP vs. THQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
16.62%5.78%22.76%21.40%25.47%39.09%-32.26%5.99%-12.67%-7.89%
THQ
Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund
-2.45%13.88%15.51%-1.62%-17.53%33.39%15.20%22.70%3.41%21.84%

Correlation

The correlation between AMLP and THQ is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2014

0.33

Over the past year, the correlation between AMLP and THQ has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.33, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMLP vs. THQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMLP
AMLP Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
AMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
AMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

THQ
THQ Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
THQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
THQ Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
THQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
THQ Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMLP vs. THQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund (THQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMLPTHQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.62

0.50

+1.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.25

0.84

+1.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.10

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.20

0.54

+1.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.36

1.50

+5.86

AMLP vs. THQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMLP Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the THQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMLP and THQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMLPTHQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

0.50

+1.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.18

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.45

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.36

-0.13

Drawdowns

AMLP vs. THQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMLP drawdown since its inception was -77.19%, which is greater than THQ's maximum drawdown of -39.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMLP and THQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMLPTHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.19%

-39.35%

-37.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-17.25%

+8.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.27%

-25.86%

+11.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

-32.20%

+11.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.62%

-39.35%

-33.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.85%

-7.66%

+3.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.40%

-8.63%

-8.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

6.27%

-3.60%

Volatility

AMLP vs. THQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) is 4.94%, while Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund (THQ) has a volatility of 5.44%. This indicates that AMLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than THQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMLPTHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.94%

5.44%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.65%

12.92%

-4.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.91%

18.24%

-6.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.98%

19.03%

+0.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.68%

20.48%

+7.20%

AMLP vs. THQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMLP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than THQ's 1.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMLP vs. THQ - Dividend Comparison

AMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.62%, less than THQ's 12.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
7.62%8.36%7.70%7.86%7.70%8.55%12.31%9.12%9.29%7.97%8.09%9.84%
THQ
Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund
12.15%11.29%11.09%7.45%6.81%5.27%6.62%7.08%8.05%7.71%8.70%9.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMLP and THQ have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THQ has higher volatility (5.44%) compared to AMLP (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMLP dropped -77.19% vs THQ's -39.35%.

AMLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMLP and THQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer