PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMLP vs. LMBS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMLP vs. LMBS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF (LMBS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMLP achieves a 22.35% return, which is significantly higher than LMBS's 1.39% return. Over the past 10 years, AMLP has outperformed LMBS with an annualized return of 7.29%, while LMBS has yielded a comparatively lower 2.59% annualized return.


AMLP

1D
0.89%
1M
6.26%
6M
14.99%
YTD
22.35%
1Y
21.27%
3Y*
19.27%
5Y*
19.50%
10Y*
7.29%
ALL TIME*
5.90%

LMBS

1D
-0.08%
1M
-0.15%
6M
0.68%
YTD
1.39%
1Y
4.45%
3Y*
5.75%
5Y*
3.07%
10Y*
2.59%
ALL TIME*
2.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$65.00M$60.75M$74.60M
$21.63M$26.61M$25.51M

AMLP vs. LMBS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
22.35%5.78%22.76%21.40%25.47%39.09%-32.26%5.99%-12.67%-7.89%
LMBS
First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF
1.39%7.05%5.15%6.10%-3.07%-0.91%1.64%4.10%1.62%1.68%

Correlation

The correlation between AMLP and LMBS is -0.23, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2014

-0.04

The correlation between AMLP and LMBS shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to -0.01 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMLP vs. LMBS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMLP
AMLP Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
AMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

LMBS
LMBS Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
LMBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LMBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LMBS Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
LMBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
LMBS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMLP vs. LMBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF (LMBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMLPLMBSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.49

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

3.41

-1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.55

13.82

-7.27

AMLP vs. LMBS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMLP Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the LMBS Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMLP and LMBS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMLP vs. LMBS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMLP drawdown since its inception was -77.19%, which is greater than LMBS's maximum drawdown of -6.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMLP and LMBS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMLPLMBSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.19%

-6.49%

-70.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.47%

-1.43%

-7.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.27%

-1.72%

-12.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

-6.03%

-14.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.62%

-6.49%

-66.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.36%

+0.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.26%

-0.80%

-16.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

0.35%

+2.85%

Volatility

AMLP vs. LMBS - Volatility Comparison

Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) has a higher volatility of 3.98% compared to First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF (LMBS) at 0.73%. This indicates that AMLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMLPLMBSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.98%

0.73%

+3.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.81%

1.54%

+8.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.55%

1.97%

+10.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.37%

2.58%

+16.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.64%

2.35%

+25.29%

AMLP vs. LMBS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMLP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than LMBS's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMLP vs. LMBS - Dividend Comparison

AMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.27%, more than LMBS's 4.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
7.27%8.36%7.70%7.86%7.70%8.55%12.31%9.12%9.29%7.97%8.09%9.84%
LMBS
First Trust Low Duration Mortgage Opportunities ETF
4.12%4.08%4.28%3.96%2.22%2.04%2.27%2.55%2.76%2.73%2.84%3.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMLP and LMBS have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMLP has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to LMBS (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMLP dropped -77.19% vs LMBS's -6.49%.

On 10-year performance, AMLP leads with 7.29% vs 2.59% for LMBS. On fees, LMBS is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, LMBS has been the lower-risk option at 0.73%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, AMLP has performed better with a 7.29% return vs 2.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LMBS is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AMLP.

AMLP has the higher dividend yield at 7.27%, compared with 4.12% for LMBS.

AMLP is categorized as MLPs, while LMBS is Mortgage Backed Securities. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for AMLP and 0.68% for LMBS.

LMBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMLP and LMBS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer