AMLP vs. IBN
AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF) is MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while IBN (ICICI Bank Limited) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, AMLP returned 6.92%/yr vs 16.38%/yr for IBN. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMLP vs. IBN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMLP achieves a 15.29% return, which is significantly higher than IBN's -6.74% return. Over the past 10 years, AMLP has underperformed IBN with an annualized return of 6.92%, while IBN has yielded a comparatively higher 16.38% annualized return.
AMLP
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -3.23%
- YTD
- 15.29%
- 6M
- 14.35%
- 1Y
- 15.02%
- 3Y*
- 20.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.26%
- 10Y*
- 6.92%
IBN
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 6.15%
- YTD
- -6.74%
- 6M
- -8.10%
- 1Y
- -15.35%
- 3Y*
- 7.22%
- 5Y*
- 10.36%
- 10Y*
- 16.38%
AMLP vs. IBN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 15.29% | 5.78% | 22.76% | 21.40% | 25.47% | 39.09% | -32.26% | 5.99% | -12.67% | -7.89% |
IBN ICICI Bank Limited | -6.74% | 0.57% | 26.32% | 9.80% | 11.27% | 33.57% | -1.52% | 47.01% | 6.25% | 44.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMLP and IBN is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2010 | 0.28 |
The correlation between AMLP and IBN shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMLP vs. IBN — Risk / Return Rank
AMLP
IBN
AMLP vs. IBN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and ICICI Bank Limited (IBN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMLP | IBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 0.87 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | -0.63 | +2.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.35 | -1.20 | +6.55 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMLP vs. IBN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMLP drawdown since its inception was -77.19%, smaller than the maximum IBN drawdown of -86.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMLP and IBN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMLP | IBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.19% | -86.09% | +8.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.94% | -26.20% | +17.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.27% | -26.20% | +11.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.92% | -26.24% | +5.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.62% | -55.05% | -17.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.94% | -18.62% | +13.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.37% | -28.00% | +10.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 13.71% | -10.94% |
Volatility
AMLP vs. IBN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) is 4.71%, while ICICI Bank Limited (IBN) has a volatility of 6.66%. This indicates that AMLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMLP | IBN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 6.66% | -1.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.77% | 17.03% | -8.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.84% | 20.68% | -8.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.95% | 23.64% | -3.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.67% | 31.63% | -3.96% |
Dividends
AMLP vs. IBN - Dividend Comparison
AMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.71%, more than IBN's 0.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 7.71% | 8.36% | 7.70% | 7.86% | 7.70% | 8.55% | 12.31% | 9.12% | 9.29% | 7.97% | 8.09% | 9.84% |
IBN ICICI Bank Limited | 0.90% | 0.84% | 0.80% | 0.81% | 0.57% | 0.27% | 0.00% | 0.19% | 0.43% | 0.79% | 1.98% | 4.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMLP and IBN have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IBN has higher volatility (6.66%) compared to AMLP (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMLP dropped -77.19% vs IBN's -86.09%.
AMLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs -0.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMLP and IBN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer