AMLP vs. GLD
AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - AMLP is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while GLD is a Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMLP returned 6.92%/yr vs 12.15%/yr for GLD. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMLP charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GLD.
Performance
AMLP vs. GLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMLP achieves a 15.29% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's -2.47% return. Over the past 10 years, AMLP has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 6.92%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.15% annualized return.
AMLP
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- 15.29%
- 6M
- 14.35%
- 1Y
- 14.76%
- 3Y*
- 20.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.26%
- 10Y*
- 6.92%
GLD
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -10.21%
- YTD
- -2.47%
- 6M
- -2.25%
- 1Y
- 23.81%
- 3Y*
- 28.89%
- 5Y*
- 17.08%
- 10Y*
- 12.15%
AMLP vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 15.29% | 5.78% | 22.76% | 21.40% | 25.47% | 39.09% | -32.26% | 5.99% | -12.67% | -7.89% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | -2.47% | 63.68% | 26.66% | 12.69% | -0.77% | -4.15% | 24.81% | 17.86% | -1.94% | 12.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMLP and GLD is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2010 | 0.08 |
The correlation between AMLP and GLD shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.14 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AMLP vs. GLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMLP
GLD
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Energy
AMLP
GLD
-
Utilities
AMLP
GLD
-
Basic Materials
AMLP
-
GLD
Communication Services
AMLP
-
GLD
-
Consumer Cyclical
AMLP
-
GLD
-
Consumer Defensive
AMLP
-
GLD
-
Financial Services
AMLP
-
GLD
-
Healthcare
AMLP
-
GLD
-
Industrials
AMLP
-
GLD
-
Real Estate
AMLP
-
GLD
-
Technology
AMLP
-
GLD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMLP vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank
AMLP
GLD
AMLP vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMLP | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.18 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 0.98 | +0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.35 | 2.81 | +2.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMLP vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMLP drawdown since its inception was -77.19%, which is greater than GLD's maximum drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMLP and GLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMLP | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.19% | -45.56% | -31.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.94% | -24.46% | +15.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.27% | -24.46% | +10.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.92% | -24.46% | +3.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.62% | -24.46% | -48.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.94% | -22.05% | +17.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.37% | -16.16% | -1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 8.49% | -5.72% |
Volatility
AMLP vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) is 4.71%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 7.79%. This indicates that AMLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMLP | GLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 7.79% | -3.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.77% | 24.10% | -15.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.84% | 27.37% | -15.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.95% | 18.22% | +1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.67% | 16.08% | +11.59% |
AMLP vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMLP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMLP vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison
AMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.71%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 7.71% | 8.36% | 7.70% | 7.86% | 7.70% | 8.55% | 12.31% | 9.12% | 9.29% | 7.97% | 8.09% | 9.84% |
GLD SPDR Gold Shares | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMLP and GLD have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GLD has higher volatility (7.79%) compared to AMLP (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMLP dropped -77.19% vs GLD's -45.56%.
On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 12.15% vs 6.92% for AMLP. On fees, GLD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, AMLP has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 12.15% return vs 6.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GLD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AMLP.
AMLP has the higher dividend yield at 7.71%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.
AMLP is categorized as MLPs, while GLD is Gold. AMLP tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for AMLP and 0.40% for GLD.
AMLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMLP and GLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer