AMLP vs. FTAL.L
AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF) and FTAL.L (SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMLP is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while FTAL.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMLP returned 6.53%/yr vs 8.44%/yr for FTAL.L. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMLP charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for FTAL.L.
Performance
AMLP vs. FTAL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AMLP is traded in USD, while FTAL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FTAL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMLP achieves a 14.23% return, which is significantly higher than FTAL.L's 4.42% return. Over the past 10 years, AMLP has underperformed FTAL.L with an annualized return of 6.53%, while FTAL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.44% annualized return.
AMLP
- 1D
- 1.95%
- 1M
- -5.26%
- YTD
- 14.23%
- 6M
- 13.82%
- 1Y
- 15.28%
- 3Y*
- 20.10%
- 5Y*
- 15.96%
- 10Y*
- 6.53%
FTAL.L
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -1.76%
- YTD
- 4.42%
- 6M
- 4.25%
- 1Y
- 18.50%
- 3Y*
- 16.54%
- 5Y*
- 9.13%
- 10Y*
- 8.44%
AMLP vs. FTAL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 14.23% | 5.78% | 22.76% | 21.40% | 25.47% | 39.09% | -32.26% | 5.99% | -12.67% | -7.89% |
FTAL.L SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF | 4.42% | 32.49% | 7.21% | 13.61% | -10.20% | 16.12% | -7.20% | 24.06% | -14.81% | 23.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMLP and FTAL.L is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2012 | 0.34 |
Over the past year, the correlation between AMLP and FTAL.L has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
AMLP vs. FTAL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMLP
FTAL.L
Energy
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Energy
AMLP
FTAL.L
Utilities
AMLP
FTAL.L
Basic Materials
AMLP
-
FTAL.L
Communication Services
AMLP
-
FTAL.L
Consumer Cyclical
AMLP
-
FTAL.L
Consumer Defensive
AMLP
-
FTAL.L
Financial Services
AMLP
-
FTAL.L
Healthcare
AMLP
-
FTAL.L
Industrials
AMLP
-
FTAL.L
Real Estate
AMLP
-
FTAL.L
Technology
AMLP
-
FTAL.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMLP vs. FTAL.L — Risk / Return Rank
AMLP
FTAL.L
AMLP vs. FTAL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMLP | FTAL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.24 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.72 | 1.86 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.16 | 5.95 | -0.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMLP vs. FTAL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMLP drawdown since its inception was -77.19%, which is greater than FTAL.L's maximum drawdown of -43.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMLP and FTAL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMLP | FTAL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.19% | -43.10% | -34.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.94% | -9.92% | +0.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.27% | -13.73% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.92% | -28.40% | +7.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.62% | -43.10% | -29.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.82% | -5.31% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.36% | -7.78% | -9.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 3.10% | -0.13% |
Volatility
AMLP vs. FTAL.L - Volatility Comparison
Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) has a higher volatility of 5.02% compared to SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAL.L) at 3.48%. This indicates that AMLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTAL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMLP | FTAL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.02% | 3.48% | +1.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.02% | 11.58% | -2.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.11% | 13.69% | -1.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.77% | 16.58% | +3.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.68% | 17.82% | +9.86% |
AMLP vs. FTAL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMLP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FTAL.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMLP vs. FTAL.L - Dividend Comparison
AMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.78%, while FTAL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 7.78% | 8.36% | 7.70% | 7.86% | 7.70% | 8.55% | 12.31% | 9.12% | 9.29% | 7.97% | 8.09% | 9.84% |
FTAL.L SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMLP and FTAL.L have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FTAL.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FTAL.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AMLP.
AMLP is categorized as MLPs, while FTAL.L is Europe Equities. AMLP tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while FTAL.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for AMLP and 0.20% for FTAL.L.
Find the right allocation for AMLP and FTAL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer