PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMLP vs. FTAL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMLP vs. FTAL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AMLP is traded in USD, while FTAL.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the FTAL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMLP achieves a 14.23% return, which is significantly higher than FTAL.L's 4.42% return. Over the past 10 years, AMLP has underperformed FTAL.L with an annualized return of 6.53%, while FTAL.L has yielded a comparatively higher 8.44% annualized return.


AMLP

1D
1.95%
1M
-5.26%
YTD
14.23%
6M
13.82%
1Y
15.28%
3Y*
20.10%
5Y*
15.96%
10Y*
6.53%

FTAL.L

1D
-0.62%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
4.42%
6M
4.25%
1Y
18.50%
3Y*
16.54%
5Y*
9.13%
10Y*
8.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMLP vs. FTAL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
14.23%5.78%22.76%21.40%25.47%39.09%-32.26%5.99%-12.67%-7.89%
FTAL.L
SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF
4.42%32.49%7.21%13.61%-10.20%16.12%-7.20%24.06%-14.81%23.73%

Correlation

The correlation between AMLP and FTAL.L is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2012

0.34

Over the past year, the correlation between AMLP and FTAL.L has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.34, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

AMLP vs. FTAL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AMLP
FTAL.L

Energy

97.7%
10.1%

Utilities

2.3%
4.6%

Basic Materials

-

8.9%

Communication Services

-

2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

12.0%

Financial Services

-

24.7%

Healthcare

-

12.6%

Industrials

-

14.8%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

1.8%

Energy

AMLP
97.7%
FTAL.L
10.1%

Utilities

AMLP
2.3%
FTAL.L
4.6%

Basic Materials

AMLP

-

FTAL.L
8.9%

Communication Services

AMLP

-

FTAL.L
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

AMLP

-

FTAL.L
5.9%

Consumer Defensive

AMLP

-

FTAL.L
12.0%

Financial Services

AMLP

-

FTAL.L
24.7%

Healthcare

AMLP

-

FTAL.L
12.6%

Industrials

AMLP

-

FTAL.L
14.8%

Real Estate

AMLP

-

FTAL.L
1.8%

Technology

AMLP

-

FTAL.L
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMLP vs. FTAL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMLP
AMLP Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
AMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
AMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

FTAL.L
FTAL.L Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
FTAL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTAL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTAL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FTAL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTAL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMLP vs. FTAL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMLPFTAL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.24

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.72

1.86

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.16

5.95

-0.79

AMLP vs. FTAL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMLP Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is comparable to the FTAL.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMLP and FTAL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMLP vs. FTAL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMLP drawdown since its inception was -77.19%, which is greater than FTAL.L's maximum drawdown of -43.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMLP and FTAL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMLPFTAL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.19%

-43.10%

-34.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-9.92%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.27%

-13.73%

-0.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

-28.40%

+7.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.62%

-43.10%

-29.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.82%

-5.31%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.36%

-7.78%

-9.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

3.10%

-0.13%

Volatility

AMLP vs. FTAL.L - Volatility Comparison

Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) has a higher volatility of 5.02% compared to SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF (FTAL.L) at 3.48%. This indicates that AMLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTAL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMLPFTAL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.02%

3.48%

+1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.02%

11.58%

-2.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.11%

13.69%

-1.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.77%

16.58%

+3.19%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.68%

17.82%

+9.86%

AMLP vs. FTAL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMLP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FTAL.L's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMLP vs. FTAL.L - Dividend Comparison

AMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.78%, while FTAL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
7.78%8.36%7.70%7.86%7.70%8.55%12.31%9.12%9.29%7.97%8.09%9.84%
FTAL.L
SPDR FTSE UK All Share UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMLP and FTAL.L have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FTAL.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FTAL.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AMLP.

AMLP is categorized as MLPs, while FTAL.L is Europe Equities. AMLP tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while FTAL.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for AMLP and 0.20% for FTAL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMLP and FTAL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer