PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMLP vs. CNI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMLP vs. CNI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and Canadian National Railway Company (CNI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMLP achieves a 15.29% return, which is significantly lower than CNI's 21.78% return. Over the past 10 years, AMLP has underperformed CNI with an annualized return of 6.92%, while CNI has yielded a comparatively higher 9.51% annualized return.


AMLP

1D
-0.34%
1M
-1.96%
YTD
15.29%
6M
14.35%
1Y
14.76%
3Y*
20.22%
5Y*
15.26%
10Y*
6.92%

CNI

1D
0.60%
1M
6.94%
YTD
21.78%
6M
22.98%
1Y
15.90%
3Y*
3.44%
5Y*
3.57%
10Y*
9.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMLP vs. CNI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
15.29%5.78%22.76%21.40%25.47%39.09%-32.26%5.99%-12.67%-7.89%
CNI
Canadian National Railway Company
21.78%-0.10%-17.51%7.84%-1.86%13.70%23.66%24.26%-8.49%25.03%

Correlation

The correlation between AMLP and CNI is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2010

0.36

Over the past year, the correlation between AMLP and CNI has dropped to 0.14 - well below their long-term average of 0.36, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMLP vs. CNI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMLP
AMLP Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
AMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
AMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

CNI
CNI Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
CNI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNI Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNI Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
CNI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNI Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMLP vs. CNI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and Canadian National Railway Company (CNI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMLPCNIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.14

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

1.13

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.35

2.08

+3.28

AMLP vs. CNI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMLP Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the CNI Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMLP and CNI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMLP vs. CNI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMLP drawdown since its inception was -77.19%, which is greater than CNI's maximum drawdown of -46.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMLP and CNI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMLPCNIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.19%

-46.66%

-30.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.94%

-14.15%

+5.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.27%

-29.14%

+14.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.92%

-29.14%

+8.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.62%

-29.15%

-43.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.94%

-5.55%

+0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.37%

-9.49%

-7.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

7.68%

-4.91%

Volatility

AMLP vs. CNI - Volatility Comparison

Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) has a higher volatility of 4.71% compared to Canadian National Railway Company (CNI) at 4.12%. This indicates that AMLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMLPCNIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.71%

4.12%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.77%

17.30%

-8.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.84%

21.90%

-10.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.95%

22.38%

-2.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.67%

22.67%

+5.00%

Dividends

AMLP vs. CNI - Dividend Comparison

AMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.71%, more than CNI's 2.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
7.71%8.36%7.70%7.86%7.70%8.55%12.31%9.12%9.29%7.97%8.09%9.84%
CNI
Canadian National Railway Company
2.20%2.58%2.43%1.85%1.41%1.61%1.59%1.79%2.01%2.00%2.23%2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMLP and CNI have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMLP has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to CNI (4.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMLP dropped -77.19% vs CNI's -46.66%.

AMLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMLP and CNI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer