AMLP vs. CME
AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF) is MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while CME (CME Group Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, AMLP returned 6.92%/yr vs 15.38%/yr for CME. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
AMLP vs. CME - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMLP achieves a 15.29% return, which is significantly higher than CME's 1.58% return. Over the past 10 years, AMLP has underperformed CME with an annualized return of 6.92%, while CME has yielded a comparatively higher 15.38% annualized return.
AMLP
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- -1.96%
- YTD
- 15.29%
- 6M
- 14.35%
- 1Y
- 14.76%
- 3Y*
- 20.22%
- 5Y*
- 15.26%
- 10Y*
- 6.92%
CME
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- -8.82%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 1.41%
- 1Y
- 3.34%
- 3Y*
- 19.92%
- 5Y*
- 9.17%
- 10Y*
- 15.38%
AMLP vs. CME - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 15.29% | 5.78% | 22.76% | 21.40% | 25.47% | 39.09% | -32.26% | 5.99% | -12.67% | -7.89% |
CME CME Group Inc. | 1.58% | 19.83% | 15.41% | 31.32% | -22.89% | 29.47% | -6.34% | 9.67% | 32.15% | 32.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMLP and CME is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2010 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMLP vs. CME — Risk / Return Rank
AMLP
CME
AMLP vs. CME - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and CME Group Inc. (CME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMLP | CME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.05 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 0.16 | +1.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.35 | 0.50 | +4.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMLP vs. CME - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMLP drawdown since its inception was -77.19%, roughly equal to the maximum CME drawdown of -77.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMLP and CME.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMLP | CME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.19% | -77.50% | +0.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.94% | -21.42% | +12.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.27% | -21.42% | +7.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.92% | -31.74% | +10.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -72.62% | -37.36% | -35.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.94% | -15.03% | +10.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.37% | -20.68% | +3.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.77% | 6.70% | -3.93% |
Volatility
AMLP vs. CME - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) is 4.71%, while CME Group Inc. (CME) has a volatility of 10.45%. This indicates that AMLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMLP | CME | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 10.45% | -5.74% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.77% | 17.44% | -8.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.84% | 20.74% | -8.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.95% | 20.15% | -0.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.67% | 23.93% | +3.74% |
Dividends
AMLP vs. CME - Dividend Comparison
AMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.71%, more than CME's 4.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 7.71% | 8.36% | 7.70% | 7.86% | 7.70% | 8.55% | 12.31% | 9.12% | 9.29% | 7.97% | 8.09% | 9.84% |
CME CME Group Inc. | 4.17% | 1.83% | 4.48% | 4.58% | 5.05% | 3.00% | 3.24% | 2.74% | 2.42% | 4.20% | 4.90% | 5.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMLP and CME have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CME has higher volatility (10.45%) compared to AMLP (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMLP dropped -77.19% vs CME's -77.50%.
AMLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.25 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMLP and CME
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer