AMLP vs. ACES

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF) and ACES (ALPS Clean Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AMLP is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while ACES is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the CIBC Atlas Clean Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AMLP returned 20.29%/yr vs -14.58%/yr for ACES. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. AMLP charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for ACES.

Performance

AMLP vs. ACES - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMLP achieves a 21.95% return, which is significantly higher than ACES's -3.43% return.

AMLP

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 5.92%
• 6M: 15.63%
• YTD: 21.95%
• 1Y: 20.87%
• 3Y*: 19.72%
• 5Y*: 20.29%
• 10Y*: 7.06%
• ALL TIME*: 5.88%

ACES

• 1D: 2.59%
• 1M: -8.35%
• 6M: -10.91%
• YTD: -3.43%
• 1Y: 18.46%
• 3Y*: -10.46%
• 5Y*: -14.58%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 3.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ACES ALPS Clean Energy ETF	$3.11M	$3.19M	$3.13M
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF	$68.05M	$61.93M	$74.57M

AMLP vs. ACES - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF	21.95%	5.78%	22.76%	21.40%	25.47%	39.09%	-32.26%	5.99%	-10.28%
ACES ALPS Clean Energy ETF	-3.43%	25.44%	-26.71%	-20.04%	-28.44%	-19.44%	140.33%	51.70%	-9.81%

Correlation

The correlation between AMLP and ACES is -0.01, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	-0.01
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.34
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2018	0.35

The correlation between AMLP and ACES shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AMLP vs. ACES - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMLP	ACES
Energy	98.1%	0.4%
Industrials	2.1%	17.8%
Utilities	1.9%	27.4%
Financial Services	0.0%	5.4%
Basic Materials	-	7.8%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	13.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.6%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	25.5%

Return for Risk

AMLP vs. ACES — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMLP

AMLP Risk / Return Rank: 67
AMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
AMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
AMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 68
AMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
AMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 57

ACES

ACES Risk / Return Rank: 23
ACES Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
ACES Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
ACES Omega Ratio Rank: 24
ACES Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
ACES Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMLP vs. ACES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) and ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMLP	ACES	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.68	0.54	+1.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.35	0.94	+1.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.11	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.48	0.60	+1.88
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.92	1.71	+5.21

AMLP vs. ACES - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMLP Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the ACES Sharpe Ratio of 0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMLP and ACES, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMLP vs. ACES - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMLP drawdown since its inception was -77.19%, roughly equal to the maximum ACES drawdown of -79.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMLP and ACES.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMLP	ACES	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.19%	-79.05%	+1.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.47%	-31.05%	+22.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.27%	-54.01%	+39.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.92%	-74.44%	+53.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-72.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.33%	-67.30%	+66.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.26%	-39.36%	+22.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.02%	10.85%	-7.83%

Volatility

AMLP vs. ACES - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) is 3.99%, while ALPS Clean Energy ETF (ACES) has a volatility of 10.60%. This indicates that AMLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMLP	ACES	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.99%	10.60%	-6.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.79%	25.93%	-16.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.50%	34.70%	-22.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.37%	36.64%	-17.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.65%	35.69%	-8.04%

AMLP vs. ACES - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMLP has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than ACES's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMLP vs. ACES - Dividend Comparison

AMLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.29%, more than ACES's 0.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACES ALPS Clean Energy ETF	0.71%	0.70%	1.10%	1.44%	1.08%	0.71%	0.56%	1.79%	0.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF	7.29%	8.36%	7.70%	7.86%	7.70%	8.55%	12.31%	9.12%	9.29%	7.97%	8.09%	9.84%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMLP and ACES in my portfolio?

AMLP and ACES have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMLP or ACES?

ACES has higher volatility (10.60%) compared to AMLP (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMLP dropped -77.19% vs ACES's -79.05%.

Which ETF is better, AMLP or ACES?

On 5-year performance, AMLP leads with 20.29% vs -14.58% for ACES. On fees, ACES is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, AMLP has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMLP or ACES?

Over the 5-year period, AMLP has performed better with a 20.29% return vs -14.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMLP or ACES?

ACES is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AMLP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMLP or ACES?

AMLP has the higher dividend yield at 7.29%, compared with 0.71% for ACES.

What is the main difference between AMLP and ACES?

AMLP is categorized as MLPs, while ACES is Alternative Energy Equities. AMLP tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index, while ACES tracks CIBC Atlas Clean Energy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for AMLP and 0.55% for ACES.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.