AMID vs. QQQN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

AMID (Argent Mid Cap ETF) and QQQN (VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. AMID is actively managed, while QQQN is passively managed. AMID charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQN.

Performance

AMID vs. QQQN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

AMID

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: -0.06%
• 6M: 4.61%
• YTD: 6.88%
• 1Y: 7.07%
• 3Y*: 9.74%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 9.94%

QQQN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AMID Argent Mid Cap ETF	$353.84K	$312.78K	$391.35K
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

AMID vs. QQQN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
AMID Argent Mid Cap ETF	4.56%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%

AMID vs. QQQN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMID	QQQN
Industrials	33.1%	8.7%
Technology	23.4%	47.3%
Financial Services	16.0%	-
Healthcare	8.0%	19.9%
Consumer Cyclical	7.0%	13.7%
Basic Materials	3.7%	1.9%
Energy	3.5%	-
Real Estate	3.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.7%	1.4%
Utilities	2.7%	1.6%
Communication Services	-	5.5%

Return for Risk

AMID vs. QQQN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMID

AMID Risk / Return Rank: 20
AMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
AMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
AMID Omega Ratio Rank: 18
AMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
AMID Martin Ratio Rank: 23

QQQN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMID vs. QQQN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMID	QQQN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.36	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.64	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.49	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.69	—	—

Drawdowns

AMID vs. QQQN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMID drawdown since its inception was -23.32%, which is greater than QQQN's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMID and QQQN.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMID	QQQN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.32%	0.00%	-23.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.31%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.03%	0.00%	-4.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.12%	0.00%	-6.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.55%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AMID	QQQN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.44%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.77%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.71%	0.00%	+16.71%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.03%	0.00%	+19.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.03%	0.00%	+19.03%

AMID vs. QQQN - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMID has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQN's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMID vs. QQQN - Dividend Comparison

AMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while QQQN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
AMID Argent Mid Cap ETF	0.33%	0.36%	0.33%	0.43%	0.25%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, AMID or QQQN?

On fees, QQQN is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMID or QQQN?

QQQN is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for AMID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMID or QQQN?

AMID has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for QQQN.

What is the main difference between AMID and QQQN?

They also come from different issuers: Argent and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for AMID and 0.18% for QQQN.