AMID vs. FNY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AMID (Argent Mid Cap ETF) and FNY (First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. AMID is actively managed, while FNY is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AMID returned 11.94%/yr vs 20.41%/yr for FNY. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AMID charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FNY.

Performance

AMID vs. FNY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) and First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FNY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMID achieves a 6.47% return, which is significantly lower than FNY's 17.52% return.

AMID

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: 3.01%
• YTD: 6.47%
• 6M: 4.43%
• 1Y: 9.43%
• 3Y*: 11.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FNY

• 1D: -1.48%
• 1M: 4.69%
• YTD: 17.52%
• 6M: 14.07%
• 1Y: 32.58%
• 3Y*: 20.41%
• 5Y*: 7.80%
• 10Y*: 14.20%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMID vs. FNY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AMID Argent Mid Cap ETF	6.47%	-1.39%	13.06%	31.26%	-7.01%
FNY First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund	17.52%	14.03%	18.09%	21.13%	-11.84%

Correlation

The correlation between AMID and FNY is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2022	0.90

The correlation between AMID and FNY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

AMID vs. FNY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AMID	FNY
Industrials	32.5%	24.9%
Technology	23.8%	19.3%
Financial Services	16.2%	9.4%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	11.8%
Healthcare	5.7%	18.6%
Energy	3.9%	1.7%
Basic Materials	3.6%	1.9%
Real Estate	3.3%	6.0%
Utilities	2.6%	0.6%
Consumer Defensive	2.3%	2.0%
Communication Services	-	3.7%

Return for Risk

AMID vs. FNY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMID

AMID Risk / Return Rank: 19
AMID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
AMID Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
AMID Omega Ratio Rank: 17
AMID Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
AMID Martin Ratio Rank: 22

FNY

FNY Risk / Return Rank: 52
FNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
FNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
FNY Omega Ratio Rank: 44
FNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
FNY Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMID vs. FNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) and First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AMID	FNY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.57	1.58	-1.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.94	2.24	-1.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.27	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.77	2.73	-1.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.66	9.82	-7.16

AMID vs. FNY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMID Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is lower than the FNY Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMID and FNY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AMID vs. FNY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMID drawdown since its inception was -23.32%, smaller than the maximum FNY drawdown of -38.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMID and FNY.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMID	FNY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.32%	-38.91%	+15.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.31%	-12.01%	-0.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.32%	-24.97%	+1.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-33.94%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.91%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.40%	-1.48%	-2.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.18%	-7.57%	+1.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.55%	3.33%	+0.22%

Volatility

AMID vs. FNY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Argent Mid Cap ETF (AMID) is 5.45%, while First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund (FNY) has a volatility of 7.20%. This indicates that AMID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMID	FNY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.45%	7.20%	-1.75%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.67%	15.86%	-3.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.59%	20.68%	-4.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.13%	22.41%	-3.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.13%	22.41%	-3.28%

AMID vs. FNY - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMID has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than FNY's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMID vs. FNY - Dividend Comparison

AMID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, more than FNY's 0.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AMID Argent Mid Cap ETF	0.34%	0.36%	0.33%	0.43%	0.25%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FNY First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund	0.03%	0.03%	0.56%	0.24%	0.24%	0.00%	0.25%	0.28%	0.06%	0.21%	0.60%	0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMID and FNY in my portfolio?

AMID and FNY have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AMID or FNY?

FNY has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to AMID (5.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMID dropped -23.32% vs FNY's -38.91%.

Which ETF is better, AMID or FNY?

On 3-year performance, FNY leads with 20.41% vs 11.94% for AMID. On fees, AMID is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, AMID has been the lower-risk option at 5.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AMID or FNY?

Over the 3-year period, FNY has performed better with a 20.41% return vs 11.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AMID or FNY?

AMID is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FNY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AMID or FNY?

AMID has the higher dividend yield at 0.34%, compared with 0.03% for FNY.

What is the main difference between AMID and FNY?

They also come from different issuers: Argent and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for AMID and 0.70% for FNY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FNY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.