PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMGOX vs. FMDGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMGOX vs. FMDGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alger Mid Cap Growth Portfolio Fund (AMGOX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMGOX achieves a 4.11% return, which is significantly higher than FMDGX's 0.31% return.


AMGOX

1D
0.20%
1M
-4.39%
6M
4.91%
YTD
4.11%
1Y
9.49%
3Y*
14.30%
5Y*
2.52%
10Y*
12.11%
ALL TIME*
10.26%

FMDGX

1D
-0.28%
1M
-4.14%
6M
0.83%
YTD
0.31%
1Y
-1.05%
3Y*
12.08%
5Y*
4.37%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

AMGOX vs. FMDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AMGOX
Alger Mid Cap Growth Portfolio Fund
4.11%16.76%21.07%23.17%-36.14%5.45%64.79%-1.20%
FMDGX
Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund
0.31%8.60%22.03%25.79%-26.67%12.67%34.84%4.63%

Correlation

The correlation between AMGOX and FMDGX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.95

The correlation between AMGOX and FMDGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMGOX vs. FMDGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AMGOX
AMGOX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
AMGOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMGOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMGOX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
AMGOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMGOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

FMDGX
FMDGX Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
FMDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
FMDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AMGOX vs. FMDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alger Mid Cap Growth Portfolio Fund (AMGOX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMGOXFMDGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

0.99

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

-0.18

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.47

-0.51

+1.98

AMGOX vs. FMDGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMGOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is higher than the FMDGX Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMGOX and FMDGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMGOX vs. FMDGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMGOX drawdown since its inception was -68.10%, which is greater than FMDGX's maximum drawdown of -38.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMGOX and FMDGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMGOXFMDGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.10%

-38.59%

-29.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.25%

-14.75%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.34%

-25.30%

-2.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.22%

-38.59%

-20.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.89%

-6.46%

-16.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.73%

-11.02%

-6.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.28%

5.30%

-0.02%

Volatility

AMGOX vs. FMDGX - Volatility Comparison

Alger Mid Cap Growth Portfolio Fund (AMGOX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund (FMDGX) have volatilities of 5.28% and 5.09%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMGOXFMDGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.28%

5.09%

+0.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.06%

13.99%

+2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.32%

17.60%

+2.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.50%

22.53%

+16.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.17%

24.22%

+7.95%

AMGOX vs. FMDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMGOX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than FMDGX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMGOX vs. FMDGX - Dividend Comparison

AMGOX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FMDGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AMGOX
Alger Mid Cap Growth Portfolio Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.72%55.13%12.13%12.09%18.59%
FMDGX
Fidelity Mid Cap Growth Index Fund
1.85%1.85%0.47%0.63%0.81%6.43%0.36%0.29%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, AMGOX and FMDGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

AMGOX has higher volatility (5.28%) compared to FMDGX (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMGOX dropped -68.10% vs FMDGX's -38.59%.

AMGOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMGOX and FMDGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer