PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMGN vs. QBTS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AMGN vs. QBTS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amgen Inc. (AMGN) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMGN achieves a 10.10% return, which is significantly higher than QBTS's -10.63% return.


AMGN

1D
0.32%
1M
6.37%
YTD
10.10%
6M
13.41%
1Y
23.07%
3Y*
20.61%
5Y*
11.36%
10Y*
12.08%

QBTS

1D
-1.89%
1M
9.00%
YTD
-10.63%
6M
-10.46%
1Y
47.17%
3Y*
123.62%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMGN vs. QBTS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AMGN
Amgen Inc.
10.10%29.67%-6.77%13.46%8.22%
QBTS
D-Wave Quantum Inc
-10.63%211.31%854.44%-38.88%-83.96%

Correlation

The correlation between AMGN and QBTS is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2022

0.04

The correlation between AMGN and QBTS shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (all time) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AMGN:

$193.23B

QBTS:

$8.59B

EPS

AMGN:

$14.38

QBTS:

-$1.08

PS Ratio

AMGN:

5.17

QBTS:

637.12

PB Ratio

AMGN:

21.03

QBTS:

7.64

Total Revenue (TTM)

AMGN:

$37.24B

QBTS:

$12.44M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AMGN:

$26.61B

QBTS:

$8.25M

EBITDA (TTM)

AMGN:

$17.27B

QBTS:

-$399.03M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMGN vs. QBTS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMGN
AMGN Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
AMGN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMGN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMGN Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
AMGN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMGN Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

QBTS
QBTS Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
QBTS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QBTS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
QBTS Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
QBTS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
QBTS Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMGN vs. QBTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amgen Inc. (AMGN) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMGNQBTSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.16

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

0.67

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.22

1.16

+2.06

AMGN vs. QBTS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMGN Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is higher than the QBTS Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMGN and QBTS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMGN vs. QBTS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMGN drawdown since its inception was -63.48%, smaller than the maximum QBTS drawdown of -96.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMGN and QBTS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMGNQBTSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.48%

-96.67%

+33.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.57%

-71.01%

+54.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.74%

-79.17%

+56.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.80%

-47.81%

+40.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.77%

-65.66%

+48.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.19%

40.64%

-33.45%

Volatility

AMGN vs. QBTS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amgen Inc. (AMGN) is 7.92%, while D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) has a volatility of 42.66%. This indicates that AMGN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMGNQBTSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.92%

42.66%

-34.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.22%

76.89%

-57.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.79%

108.46%

-80.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.97%

150.99%

-127.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.86%

150.99%

-126.13%

Dividends

AMGN vs. QBTS - Dividend Comparison

AMGN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, while QBTS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMGN
Amgen Inc.
2.76%2.91%3.45%2.96%2.95%3.13%2.78%2.41%2.71%2.65%2.74%1.95%
QBTS
D-Wave Quantum Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

AMGN vs. QBTS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Amgen Inc. and D-Wave Quantum Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B20222023202420252026
8.62B
2.86M
(AMGN) Total Revenue
(QBTS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AMGN and QBTS have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QBTS has higher volatility (42.66%) compared to AMGN (7.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMGN dropped -63.48% vs QBTS's -96.67%.

AMGN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.84 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMGN and QBTS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer