AMFAX vs. PQTPX
Compare and contrast key facts about AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (AMFAX) and PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX).
AMFAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jul 30, 2010. PQTPX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 30, 2013.
Performance
AMFAX vs. PQTPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AMFAX vs. PQTPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMFAX AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A | 6.69% | -9.75% | -3.56% | -10.59% | 35.38% | 3.28% | 13.29% | 8.03% | -12.87% | 6.54% |
PQTPX PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 3.86% | 2.41% | -3.08% | -4.21% | 11.37% | 14.83% | 9.72% | 2.83% | 2.30% | 2.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMFAX achieves a 6.69% return, which is significantly higher than PQTPX's 3.86% return. Over the past 10 years, AMFAX has underperformed PQTPX with an annualized return of 1.57%, while PQTPX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.67% annualized return.
AMFAX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -0.85%
- YTD
- 6.69%
- 6M
- 10.56%
- 1Y
- 3.12%
- 3Y*
- -3.09%
- 5Y*
- 2.04%
- 10Y*
- 1.57%
PQTPX
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- 3.86%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- 1Y
- 11.41%
- 3Y*
- 1.82%
- 5Y*
- 4.08%
- 10Y*
- 3.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AMFAX vs. PQTPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMFAX has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than PQTPX's 1.51% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AMFAX vs. PQTPX — Risk / Return Rank
AMFAX
PQTPX
AMFAX vs. PQTPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (AMFAX) and PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMFAX | PQTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.26 | 1.30 | -1.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.40 | 1.78 | -1.37 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.23 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | 1.41 | -1.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.27 | 3.42 | -3.15 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMFAX | PQTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | 1.30 | -1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.42 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 | 0.39 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.45 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between AMFAX and PQTPX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
AMFAX vs. PQTPX - Dividend Comparison
AMFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, while PQTPX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMFAX AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A | 1.72% | 1.84% | 1.28% | 0.30% | 32.70% | 5.74% | 3.14% | 4.71% | 1.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.92% |
PQTPX PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 14.80% | 2.40% | 5.63% | 2.49% | 0.32% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 7.57% |
Drawdowns
AMFAX vs. PQTPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMFAX drawdown since its inception was -36.84%, which is greater than PQTPX's maximum drawdown of -27.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMFAX and PQTPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMFAX | PQTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.84% | -27.86% | -8.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.54% | -8.02% | -5.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.84% | -27.86% | -8.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.84% | -27.86% | -8.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.86% | -13.32% | -11.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.55% | -9.37% | -4.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.33% | 3.31% | +5.02% |
Volatility
AMFAX vs. PQTPX - Volatility Comparison
AlphaSimplex Managed Futures Strategy Fund Class A (AMFAX) has a higher volatility of 3.91% compared to PIMCO TRENDS Managed Futures Strategy Fund (PQTPX) at 3.63%. This indicates that AMFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PQTPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AMFAX | PQTPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.91% | 3.63% | +0.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.01% | 6.73% | +3.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.03% | 8.75% | +4.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.68% | 9.87% | +3.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.67% | 9.36% | +3.31% |