PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMEW.DE vs. IQQJ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMEW.DE vs. IQQJ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR (AMEW.DE) and iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQJ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMEW.DE achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly lower than IQQJ.DE's 16.83% return. Over the past 10 years, AMEW.DE has outperformed IQQJ.DE with an annualized return of 12.59%, while IQQJ.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 8.94% annualized return.


AMEW.DE

1D
-0.03%
1M
4.92%
YTD
10.74%
6M
11.18%
1Y
23.45%
3Y*
17.26%
5Y*
12.62%
10Y*
12.59%

IQQJ.DE

1D
-14.69%
1M
5.85%
YTD
16.83%
6M
16.70%
1Y
30.57%
3Y*
15.45%
5Y*
9.84%
10Y*
8.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMEW.DE vs. IQQJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMEW.DE
Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR
10.74%7.42%25.77%19.94%-13.88%32.66%5.32%31.10%-5.22%7.54%
IQQJ.DE
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist)
16.83%12.69%13.58%16.03%-12.77%9.53%4.77%21.88%-10.11%8.81%

Correlation

The correlation between AMEW.DE and IQQJ.DE is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2012

0.69

The correlation between AMEW.DE and IQQJ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.70 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMEW.DE vs. IQQJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMEW.DE
AMEW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
AMEW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMEW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMEW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
AMEW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMEW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

IQQJ.DE
IQQJ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
IQQJ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQJ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQJ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQJ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQJ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMEW.DE vs. IQQJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR (AMEW.DE) and iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMEW.DEIQQJ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.28

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

2.07

+1.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.99

9.16

+4.82

AMEW.DE vs. IQQJ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMEW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the IQQJ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMEW.DE and IQQJ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMEW.DEIQQJ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

0.87

+1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.46

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.47

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.28

+0.59

Drawdowns

AMEW.DE vs. IQQJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMEW.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.73%, smaller than the maximum IQQJ.DE drawdown of -54.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEW.DE and IQQJ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMEW.DEIQQJ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.73%

-54.99%

+21.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.61%

-14.69%

+8.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.69%

-16.72%

-4.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.69%

-19.40%

-2.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.73%

-28.02%

-5.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-14.69%

+14.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.29%

-16.84%

+12.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

3.33%

-1.66%

Volatility

AMEW.DE vs. IQQJ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR (AMEW.DE) is 2.60%, while iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist) (IQQJ.DE) has a volatility of 30.30%. This indicates that AMEW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQQJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMEW.DEIQQJ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.60%

30.30%

-27.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.64%

33.04%

-25.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.11%

34.82%

-23.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.16%

21.13%

-6.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.03%

18.82%

-3.79%

AMEW.DE vs. IQQJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMEW.DE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than IQQJ.DE's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMEW.DE vs. IQQJ.DE - Dividend Comparison

AMEW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQQJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMEW.DE
Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IQQJ.DE
iShares MSCI Japan UCITS ETF (Dist)
1.52%1.79%1.48%1.42%1.76%1.16%1.40%1.41%1.44%1.23%1.21%0.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMEW.DE and IQQJ.DE have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IQQJ.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IQQJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for AMEW.DE.

AMEW.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while IQQJ.DE is Japan Equities. AMEW.DE tracks MSCI World, while IQQJ.DE tracks MSCI Japan. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for AMEW.DE and 0.12% for IQQJ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMEW.DE and IQQJ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer