PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMEW.DE vs. IQQI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMEW.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR (AMEW.DE) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF (IQQI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMEW.DE achieves a 11.85% return, which is significantly lower than IQQI.DE's 16.66% return. Over the past 10 years, AMEW.DE has outperformed IQQI.DE with an annualized return of 12.17%, while IQQI.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 6.70% annualized return.


AMEW.DE

1D
0.29%
1M
0.33%
6M
10.58%
YTD
11.85%
1Y
22.08%
3Y*
16.92%
5Y*
11.82%
10Y*
12.17%
ALL TIME*
13.67%

IQQI.DE

1D
-0.48%
1M
4.19%
6M
13.95%
YTD
16.66%
1Y
19.61%
3Y*
10.66%
5Y*
7.63%
10Y*
6.70%
ALL TIME*
5.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMEW.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMEW.DE
Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR
11.85%7.42%25.77%19.94%-13.80%32.54%5.32%31.10%-5.22%7.54%
IQQI.DE
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF
16.66%0.56%14.53%-3.18%-0.38%26.94%-10.82%27.73%2.23%0.70%

Correlation

The correlation between AMEW.DE and IQQI.DE is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2011

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between AMEW.DE and IQQI.DE has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMEW.DE vs. IQQI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMEW.DE
AMEW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
AMEW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMEW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMEW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
AMEW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMEW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

IQQI.DE
IQQI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
IQQI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMEW.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR (AMEW.DE) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF (IQQI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMEW.DEIQQI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.31

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.38

4.06

-0.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.36

10.15

+3.22

AMEW.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMEW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the IQQI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMEW.DE and IQQI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMEW.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMEW.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.73%, smaller than the maximum IQQI.DE drawdown of -42.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEW.DE and IQQI.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMEW.DEIQQI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.73%

-42.24%

+8.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.51%

-4.81%

-1.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.69%

-14.75%

-6.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.69%

-24.82%

+3.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.73%

-34.16%

+0.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-0.48%

-0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.07%

-11.07%

+7.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.65%

1.93%

-0.28%

Volatility

AMEW.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR (AMEW.DE) and iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF (IQQI.DE) have volatilities of 2.68% and 2.63%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMEW.DEIQQI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.68%

2.63%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.82%

8.58%

-0.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.00%

10.78%

+0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.13%

12.74%

+1.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.98%

14.25%

+0.73%

AMEW.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMEW.DE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQI.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMEW.DE vs. IQQI.DE - Dividend Comparison

AMEW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQQI.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMEW.DE
Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IQQI.DE
iShares Global Infrastructure UCITS ETF
1.98%2.30%2.29%2.42%2.13%1.85%2.25%2.05%2.30%2.76%2.63%3.15%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMEW.DE and IQQI.DE have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMEW.DE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMEW.DE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IQQI.DE.

AMEW.DE tracks MSCI World, while IQQI.DE tracks FTSE Global Core Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for AMEW.DE and 0.65% for IQQI.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMEW.DE and IQQI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer