AMEW.DE vs. ETLQ.DE
AMEW.DE (Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR) and ETLQ.DE (L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - AMEW.DE tracks the MSCI World while ETLQ.DE tracks the Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AMEW.DE returned 12.62%/yr vs 13.10%/yr for ETLQ.DE. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. AMEW.DE charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for ETLQ.DE.
Performance
AMEW.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AMEW.DE having a 10.74% return and ETLQ.DE slightly higher at 10.88%.
AMEW.DE
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 10.74%
- 6M
- 11.18%
- 1Y
- 23.45%
- 3Y*
- 17.26%
- 5Y*
- 12.62%
- 10Y*
- 12.59%
ETLQ.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.96%
- YTD
- 10.88%
- 6M
- 11.36%
- 1Y
- 23.93%
- 3Y*
- 17.73%
- 5Y*
- 13.10%
- 10Y*
- —
AMEW.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEW.DE Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR | 10.74% | 7.42% | 25.77% | 19.94% | -13.88% | 32.66% | 5.32% | 24.40% |
ETLQ.DE L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF | 10.88% | 8.14% | 26.10% | 20.83% | -13.64% | 32.63% | 5.63% | 24.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMEW.DE and ETLQ.DE is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2019 | 0.98 |
The correlation between AMEW.DE and ETLQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMEW.DE vs. ETLQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMEW.DE
ETLQ.DE
AMEW.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR (AMEW.DE) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (ETLQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMEW.DE | ETLQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.39 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.54 | 3.56 | -0.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.99 | 14.23 | -0.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMEW.DE | ETLQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 2.13 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 | 0.92 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.93 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
AMEW.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMEW.DE drawdown since its inception was -33.73%, roughly equal to the maximum ETLQ.DE drawdown of -33.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEW.DE and ETLQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMEW.DE | ETLQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.73% | -33.38% | -0.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.61% | -6.68% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.69% | -21.58% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.69% | -21.58% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.31% | -0.34% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.29% | -4.33% | +0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.67% | 1.68% | -0.01% |
Volatility
AMEW.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI World UCITS ETF EUR (AMEW.DE) and L&G Global Equity UCITS ETF (ETLQ.DE) have volatilities of 2.60% and 2.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMEW.DE | ETLQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.60% | 2.68% | -0.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.64% | 7.77% | -0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.11% | 11.18% | -0.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.16% | 14.06% | +0.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 15.74% | -0.71% |
AMEW.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMEW.DE has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than ETLQ.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMEW.DE vs. ETLQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMEW.DE nor ETLQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, AMEW.DE and ETLQ.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, ETLQ.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ETLQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for AMEW.DE.
AMEW.DE tracks MSCI World, while ETLQ.DE tracks Solactive Core Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for AMEW.DE and 0.10% for ETLQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for AMEW.DE and ETLQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer