PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMES.DE vs. H4ZA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMES.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE) and HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AMES.DE having a 7.00% return and H4ZA.DE slightly higher at 7.24%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AMES.DE having a 11.05% annualized return and H4ZA.DE not far behind at 10.80%.


AMES.DE

1D
0.51%
1M
3.60%
YTD
7.00%
6M
10.82%
1Y
33.98%
3Y*
29.84%
5Y*
19.21%
10Y*
11.05%

H4ZA.DE

1D
0.77%
1M
4.72%
YTD
7.24%
6M
8.63%
1Y
15.73%
3Y*
16.60%
5Y*
12.12%
10Y*
10.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMES.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMES.DE
Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR
7.00%55.41%19.00%25.94%0.03%6.96%-12.87%15.76%-12.77%11.84%
H4ZA.DE
HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR
7.24%22.26%13.81%22.59%-8.87%23.72%-2.73%30.07%-11.96%10.07%

Correlation

The correlation between AMES.DE and H4ZA.DE is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2011

0.71

The correlation between AMES.DE and H4ZA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (10 years) to 0.84 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMES.DE vs. H4ZA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMES.DE
AMES.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
AMES.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMES.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

H4ZA.DE
H4ZA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
H4ZA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMES.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE) and HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMES.DEH4ZA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.18

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

1.43

+1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.80

4.85

+6.95

AMES.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMES.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is higher than the H4ZA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMES.DE and H4ZA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMES.DEH4ZA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.06

0.98

+1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.20

0.69

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.59

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.41

+0.07

Drawdowns

AMES.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMES.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.98%, which is greater than H4ZA.DE's maximum drawdown of -38.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMES.DE and H4ZA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMES.DEH4ZA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.98%

-38.41%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.95%

-10.97%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.58%

-16.40%

+3.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.77%

-23.26%

+5.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.98%

-38.41%

-2.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.52%

-0.50%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.76%

-7.84%

-1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.87%

3.24%

-0.37%

Volatility

AMES.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR (AMES.DE) is 4.59%, while HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR (H4ZA.DE) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that AMES.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than H4ZA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMES.DEH4ZA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

4.95%

-0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.65%

12.99%

+0.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.43%

15.99%

+0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.01%

17.50%

+0.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.82%

18.17%

+2.65%

AMES.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMES.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than H4ZA.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AMES.DE vs. H4ZA.DE - Dividend Comparison

AMES.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while H4ZA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.44%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMES.DE
Amundi ETF MSCI Spain UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
H4ZA.DE
HSBC EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF EUR
2.44%2.49%5.35%2.93%2.94%1.94%2.06%2.84%3.55%2.73%2.85%2.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMES.DE and H4ZA.DE have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, H4ZA.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H4ZA.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for AMES.DE.

AMES.DE tracks MSCI Spain, while H4ZA.DE tracks EURO STOXX® 50. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AMES.DE and 0.05% for H4ZA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMES.DE and H4ZA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer