PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMEM.DE vs. 84X0.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMEM.DE vs. 84X0.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR (AMEM.DE) and iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD Acc (84X0.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMEM.DE achieves a 27.34% return, which is significantly lower than 84X0.DE's 40.37% return.


AMEM.DE

1D
-1.57%
1M
5.93%
YTD
27.34%
6M
29.35%
1Y
49.79%
3Y*
20.85%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
9.86%

84X0.DE

1D
-1.73%
1M
8.33%
YTD
40.37%
6M
44.02%
1Y
68.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMEM.DE vs. 84X0.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AMEM.DE
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR
27.34%19.31%13.70%3.80%
84X0.DE
iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD Acc
40.37%19.85%9.62%7.38%

Correlation

The correlation between AMEM.DE and 84X0.DE is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2023

0.89

The correlation between AMEM.DE and 84X0.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMEM.DE vs. 84X0.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMEM.DE
AMEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
AMEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AMEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

84X0.DE
84X0.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
84X0.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
84X0.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
84X0.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
84X0.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
84X0.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMEM.DE vs. 84X0.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR (AMEM.DE) and iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD Acc (84X0.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMEM.DE84X0.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.64

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.65

5.88

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.89

21.92

-5.03

AMEM.DE vs. 84X0.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMEM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the 84X0.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMEM.DE and 84X0.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMEM.DE84X0.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.80

3.52

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

1.77

-1.43

Drawdowns

AMEM.DE vs. 84X0.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMEM.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.87%, which is greater than 84X0.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEM.DE and 84X0.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMEM.DE84X0.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.87%

-19.72%

-16.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.65%

-11.66%

+1.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.62%

-2.49%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.29%

-2.70%

-7.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

3.13%

-0.19%

Volatility

AMEM.DE vs. 84X0.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR (AMEM.DE) is 7.41%, while iShares MSCI EM ex-China UCITS ETF USD Acc (84X0.DE) has a volatility of 8.41%. This indicates that AMEM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 84X0.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMEM.DE84X0.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.41%

8.41%

-1.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.02%

16.93%

-1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.74%

19.46%

-1.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.70%

17.11%

-0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.28%

17.11%

+1.17%

AMEM.DE vs. 84X0.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMEM.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than 84X0.DE's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AMEM.DE vs. 84X0.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither AMEM.DE nor 84X0.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, AMEM.DE and 84X0.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, 84X0.DE is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

84X0.DE is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AMEM.DE.

AMEM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while 84X0.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AMEM.DE and 0.18% for 84X0.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMEM.DE and 84X0.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer