AMEL.DE vs. XGSD.L
AMEL.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR) and XGSD.L (Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D) are both exchange-traded funds - AMEL.DE is a Latin America Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America, while XGSD.L is a Global Equity Income fund tracking the STOXX Global Select Dividend 100. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMEL.DE returned 8.05%/yr vs 9.46%/yr for XGSD.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMEL.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for XGSD.L.
Performance
AMEL.DE vs. XGSD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AMEL.DE is traded in EUR, while XGSD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XGSD.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMEL.DE achieves a 13.84% return, which is significantly lower than XGSD.L's 15.18% return. Over the past 10 years, AMEL.DE has underperformed XGSD.L with an annualized return of 8.05%, while XGSD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 9.46% annualized return.
AMEL.DE
- 1D
- 3.30%
- 1M
- -3.05%
- YTD
- 13.84%
- 6M
- 14.72%
- 1Y
- 37.57%
- 3Y*
- 10.30%
- 5Y*
- 10.14%
- 10Y*
- 8.05%
XGSD.L
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 15.18%
- 6M
- 16.79%
- 1Y
- 31.08%
- 3Y*
- 19.16%
- 5Y*
- 11.13%
- 10Y*
- 9.46%
AMEL.DE vs. XGSD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEL.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR | 13.84% | 38.05% | -22.20% | 28.15% | 16.33% | -3.25% | -21.25% | 20.70% | -3.30% | 8.15% |
XGSD.L Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D | 15.18% | 18.96% | 14.36% | 5.00% | -1.10% | 22.32% | -8.65% | 23.62% | -6.77% | 2.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMEL.DE and XGSD.L is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2011 | 0.55 |
The correlation between AMEL.DE and XGSD.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMEL.DE vs. XGSD.L — Risk / Return Rank
AMEL.DE
XGSD.L
AMEL.DE vs. XGSD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) and Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XGSD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMEL.DE | XGSD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.14 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.64 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 8.13 | -5.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.36 | 29.12 | -19.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMEL.DE vs. XGSD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMEL.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.71%, smaller than the maximum XGSD.L drawdown of -70.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEL.DE and XGSD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMEL.DE | XGSD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.71% | -70.20% | +17.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.17% | -3.80% | -9.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.37% | -13.74% | -11.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.37% | -13.74% | -11.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.33% | -38.13% | -13.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.43% | 0.00% | -8.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.87% | -15.56% | -2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.00% | 1.06% | +2.94% |
Volatility
AMEL.DE vs. XGSD.L - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D (XGSD.L) at 2.29%. This indicates that AMEL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XGSD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMEL.DE | XGSD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.66% | 2.29% | +4.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.86% | 6.60% | +9.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.76% | 8.97% | +9.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.00% | 12.02% | +8.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.29% | 14.74% | +10.55% |
AMEL.DE vs. XGSD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMEL.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than XGSD.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMEL.DE vs. XGSD.L - Dividend Comparison
AMEL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XGSD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEL.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XGSD.L Xtrackers Stoxx Global Select Dividend 100 Swap UCITS ETF 1D | 4.11% | 4.60% | 6.38% | 7.51% | 8.71% | 4.76% | 5.34% | 4.30% | 4.68% | 3.56% | 2.74% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMEL.DE and XGSD.L have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMEL.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMEL.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for XGSD.L.
AMEL.DE is categorized as Latin America Equities, while XGSD.L is Global Equity Income. AMEL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America, while XGSD.L tracks STOXX Global Select Dividend 100. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AMEL.DE and 0.50% for XGSD.L.
Find the right allocation for AMEL.DE and XGSD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer