PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMEL.DE vs. LYYA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMEL.DE vs. LYYA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) and Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist (LYYA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMEL.DE achieves a 13.84% return, which is significantly higher than LYYA.DE's 9.94% return. Over the past 10 years, AMEL.DE has underperformed LYYA.DE with an annualized return of 8.05%, while LYYA.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.98% annualized return.


AMEL.DE

1D
3.30%
1M
-3.05%
YTD
13.84%
6M
14.72%
1Y
37.57%
3Y*
10.30%
5Y*
10.14%
10Y*
8.05%

LYYA.DE

1D
1.68%
1M
2.06%
YTD
9.94%
6M
11.38%
1Y
23.39%
3Y*
16.79%
5Y*
12.49%
10Y*
12.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMEL.DE vs. LYYA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AMEL.DE
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR
13.84%38.05%-22.20%28.15%16.33%-3.25%-21.25%20.70%-3.30%8.15%
LYYA.DE
Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist
9.94%7.88%26.02%20.23%-13.67%32.82%5.50%31.13%-5.06%7.74%

Correlation

The correlation between AMEL.DE and LYYA.DE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2011

0.55

The correlation between AMEL.DE and LYYA.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (3 years) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMEL.DE vs. LYYA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMEL.DE
AMEL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
AMEL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMEL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

LYYA.DE
LYYA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
LYYA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYYA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYYA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
LYYA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYYA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMEL.DE vs. LYYA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) and Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist (LYYA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AMEL.DELYYA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.38

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.84

3.62

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.36

14.54

-5.18

AMEL.DE vs. LYYA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMEL.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the LYYA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMEL.DE and LYYA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AMEL.DE vs. LYYA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMEL.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.71%, roughly equal to the maximum LYYA.DE drawdown of -54.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEL.DE and LYYA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMEL.DELYYA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.71%

-54.50%

+1.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.17%

-6.43%

-6.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.37%

-21.64%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.37%

-21.64%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.33%

-33.90%

-17.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.43%

-1.18%

-7.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.87%

-9.84%

-8.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.00%

1.60%

+2.40%

Volatility

AMEL.DE vs. LYYA.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR (AMEL.DE) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist (LYYA.DE) at 3.12%. This indicates that AMEL.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYYA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMEL.DELYYA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.66%

3.12%

+3.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.86%

8.05%

+7.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.76%

11.32%

+7.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.00%

14.19%

+6.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.29%

15.13%

+10.16%

AMEL.DE vs. LYYA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMEL.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than LYYA.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMEL.DE vs. LYYA.DE - Dividend Comparison

AMEL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LYYA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMEL.DE
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America UCITS ETF EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LYYA.DE
Amundi MSCI World II UCITS ETF Dist
1.14%1.26%1.63%1.35%1.95%1.31%1.58%1.49%2.36%2.05%2.33%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMEL.DE and LYYA.DE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMEL.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMEL.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LYYA.DE.

AMEL.DE is categorized as Latin America Equities, while LYYA.DE is Global Equities. AMEL.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Latin America, while LYYA.DE tracks MSCI World. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AMEL.DE and 0.30% for LYYA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMEL.DE and LYYA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer