AMEE.DE vs. IQQH.DE
AMEE.DE (Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc) and IQQH.DE (iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both Energy Equities funds - AMEE.DE tracks the Bloomberg Hydrogen ESG while IQQH.DE tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMEE.DE returned 15.13%/yr vs 11.71%/yr for IQQH.DE. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMEE.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for IQQH.DE.
Performance
AMEE.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMEE.DE achieves a 27.83% return, which is significantly lower than IQQH.DE's 39.28% return. Over the past 10 years, AMEE.DE has outperformed IQQH.DE with an annualized return of 15.13%, while IQQH.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 11.71% annualized return.
AMEE.DE
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- 27.83%
- 6M
- 26.99%
- 1Y
- 61.42%
- 3Y*
- 32.97%
- 5Y*
- 28.59%
- 10Y*
- 15.13%
IQQH.DE
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- 8.24%
- YTD
- 39.28%
- 6M
- 36.90%
- 1Y
- 77.84%
- 3Y*
- 5.37%
- 5Y*
- 2.58%
- 10Y*
- 11.71%
AMEE.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEE.DE Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 27.83% | 37.58% | 15.56% | 12.19% | 35.81% | 34.64% | -31.29% | 10.32% | -0.78% | 5.51% |
IQQH.DE iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 39.28% | 29.83% | -21.49% | -22.15% | 0.84% | -17.65% | 117.65% | 49.62% | -4.26% | 7.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMEE.DE and IQQH.DE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2011 | 0.46 |
Over the past year, AMEE.DE and IQQH.DE have become more correlated (0.70) than their long-term average of 0.46, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMEE.DE vs. IQQH.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMEE.DE
IQQH.DE
AMEE.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc (AMEE.DE) and iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMEE.DE | IQQH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.50 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.71 | 6.29 | +1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 23.88 | 19.88 | +3.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMEE.DE | IQQH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.24 | 3.18 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.27 | 0.10 | +1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.46 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | -0.01 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
AMEE.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMEE.DE drawdown since its inception was -59.14%, smaller than the maximum IQQH.DE drawdown of -86.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEE.DE and IQQH.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMEE.DE | IQQH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.14% | -86.09% | +26.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.92% | -12.32% | +4.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.74% | -44.74% | +29.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.23% | -57.70% | +38.47% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.14% | -63.78% | +4.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.54% | -24.01% | +20.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.65% | -59.78% | +49.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.56% | 3.90% | -1.34% |
Volatility
AMEE.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc (AMEE.DE) is 7.10%, while iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQH.DE) has a volatility of 9.79%. This indicates that AMEE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQQH.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMEE.DE | IQQH.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.10% | 9.79% | -2.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.18% | 18.31% | -4.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.89% | 24.37% | -5.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.25% | 24.69% | -2.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.74% | 25.08% | +0.66% |
AMEE.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMEE.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than IQQH.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMEE.DE vs. IQQH.DE - Dividend Comparison
AMEE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IQQH.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEE.DE Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQH.DE iShares Global Clean Energy UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.94% | 1.53% | 1.32% | 1.23% | 0.83% | 1.23% | 0.56% | 2.89% | 3.30% | 4.82% | 4.72% | 2.86% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMEE.DE and IQQH.DE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMEE.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMEE.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IQQH.DE.
AMEE.DE tracks Bloomberg Hydrogen ESG, while IQQH.DE tracks S&P Global Clean Energy. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for AMEE.DE and 0.65% for IQQH.DE.
Find the right allocation for AMEE.DE and IQQH.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer