AMED.DE vs. ESNB.DE
AMED.DE (Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C)) and ESNB.DE (Expat Serbia BELEX15 UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - AMED.DE tracks the MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped while ESNB.DE tracks the BELEX15 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AMED.DE returned 10.77%/yr vs -1.81%/yr for ESNB.DE. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMED.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.38%/yr for ESNB.DE.
Performance
AMED.DE vs. ESNB.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMED.DE achieves a 18.14% return, which is significantly higher than ESNB.DE's -6.99% return.
AMED.DE
- 1D
- -1.04%
- 1M
- -1.82%
- 6M
- 15.03%
- YTD
- 18.14%
- 1Y
- 28.30%
- 3Y*
- 15.90%
- 5Y*
- 10.77%
- 10Y*
- —
ESNB.DE
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -0.56%
- 6M
- -5.83%
- YTD
- -6.99%
- 1Y
- -5.51%
- 3Y*
- -1.61%
- 5Y*
- -1.81%
- 10Y*
- —
AMED.DE vs. ESNB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMED.DE Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) | 18.14% | 20.15% | 5.95% | 16.68% | -10.71% | 20.90% | -1.35% | 27.22% | -12.56% |
ESNB.DE Expat Serbia BELEX15 UCITS ETF | -6.99% | 0.82% | 0.78% | 2.90% | -8.70% | 5.74% | -3.42% | 5.43% | -7.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMED.DE and ESNB.DE is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2018 | 0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMED.DE vs. ESNB.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMED.DE
ESNB.DE
AMED.DE vs. ESNB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) and Expat Serbia BELEX15 UCITS ETF (ESNB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMED.DE | ESNB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 0.91 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | -0.53 | +3.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.34 | -1.12 | +11.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMED.DE vs. ESNB.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMED.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.35%, which is greater than ESNB.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMED.DE and ESNB.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMED.DE | ESNB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.35% | -22.77% | -15.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -10.40% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.07% | -12.60% | -1.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.06% | -15.85% | -8.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.75% | -13.67% | +10.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.58% | -8.44% | +2.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 4.91% | -2.18% |
Volatility
AMED.DE vs. ESNB.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR EUR (C) (AMED.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.63% compared to Expat Serbia BELEX15 UCITS ETF (ESNB.DE) at 3.05%. This indicates that AMED.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESNB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMED.DE | ESNB.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | 3.05% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.98% | 6.22% | +6.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.28% | 9.72% | +5.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.87% | 10.52% | +5.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.34% | 12.11% | +5.23% |
AMED.DE vs. ESNB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMED.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ESNB.DE's 1.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMED.DE vs. ESNB.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMED.DE nor ESNB.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMED.DE and ESNB.DE have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMED.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMED.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.38% for ESNB.DE.
AMED.DE tracks MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select 5% Issuer Capped, while ESNB.DE tracks BELEX15 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Expat. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for AMED.DE and 1.38% for ESNB.DE.
Find the right allocation for AMED.DE and ESNB.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer