AMEA.DE vs. WTDX.DE
AMEA.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR) and WTDX.DE (WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged) are both exchange-traded funds - AMEA.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while WTDX.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity UCITS Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMEA.DE returned 9.38%/yr vs 17.78%/yr for WTDX.DE. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMEA.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for WTDX.DE.
Performance
AMEA.DE vs. WTDX.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with AMEA.DE having a 23.16% return and WTDX.DE slightly higher at 23.42%. Over the past 10 years, AMEA.DE has underperformed WTDX.DE with an annualized return of 9.38%, while WTDX.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 17.78% annualized return.
AMEA.DE
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -9.94%
- 6M
- 15.40%
- YTD
- 23.16%
- 1Y
- 37.53%
- 3Y*
- 20.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.81%
- 10Y*
- 9.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.35%
WTDX.DE
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- -2.25%
- 6M
- 14.64%
- YTD
- 23.42%
- 1Y
- 54.51%
- 3Y*
- 29.41%
- 5Y*
- 27.57%
- 10Y*
- 17.78%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.11%
AMEA.DE vs. WTDX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR | 23.16% | 18.02% | 18.95% | 3.13% | -15.22% | 1.46% | 15.62% | 22.11% | -12.33% | 25.52% |
WTDX.DE WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged | 23.42% | 17.86% | 36.79% | 37.12% | 11.85% | 27.70% | -6.91% | 24.57% | -17.23% | 8.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMEA.DE and WTDX.DE is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2015 | 0.38 |
The correlation between AMEA.DE and WTDX.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (10 years) to 0.45 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMEA.DE vs. WTDX.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMEA.DE
WTDX.DE
AMEA.DE vs. WTDX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE) and WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged (WTDX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMEA.DE | WTDX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.49 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | 6.71 | -3.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.19 | 22.08 | -12.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMEA.DE vs. WTDX.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMEA.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, smaller than the maximum WTDX.DE drawdown of -38.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEA.DE and WTDX.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMEA.DE | WTDX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.43% | -38.23% | +2.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.20% | -8.09% | -5.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.46% | -23.65% | +3.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.47% | -23.65% | -3.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.29% | -32.53% | -0.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.86% | -3.91% | -7.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.78% | -9.16% | -1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.07% | 2.46% | +1.61% |
Volatility
AMEA.DE vs. WTDX.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.01% compared to WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged (WTDX.DE) at 5.96%. This indicates that AMEA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WTDX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMEA.DE | WTDX.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.01% | 5.96% | +4.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.59% | 14.70% | +4.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.25% | 19.64% | +2.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.90% | 19.43% | -0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 21.54% | -2.34% |
AMEA.DE vs. WTDX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMEA.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than WTDX.DE's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMEA.DE vs. WTDX.DE - Dividend Comparison
AMEA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WTDX.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WTDX.DE WisdomTree Japan Equity UCITS ETF USD Hedged | 0.82% | 1.68% | 1.52% | 1.97% | 2.28% | 1.52% | 2.10% | 2.01% | 2.17% | 1.14% | 1.90% | 0.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMEA.DE and WTDX.DE have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMEA.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMEA.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for WTDX.DE.
AMEA.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while WTDX.DE is Japan Equities. AMEA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while WTDX.DE tracks WisdomTree Japan Hedged Equity UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AMEA.DE and 0.48% for WTDX.DE.
Find the right allocation for AMEA.DE and WTDX.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer