AMEA.DE vs. VGEJ.DE
AMEA.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR) and VGEJ.DE (Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - AMEA.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia while VGEJ.DE tracks the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, AMEA.DE returned 11.07%/yr vs 15.36%/yr for VGEJ.DE. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMEA.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for VGEJ.DE.
Performance
AMEA.DE vs. VGEJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMEA.DE achieves a 31.99% return, which is significantly lower than VGEJ.DE's 50.18% return. Over the past 10 years, AMEA.DE has underperformed VGEJ.DE with an annualized return of 11.07%, while VGEJ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.36% annualized return.
AMEA.DE
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- 5.25%
- YTD
- 31.99%
- 6M
- 32.57%
- 1Y
- 54.12%
- 3Y*
- 22.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.87%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
VGEJ.DE
- 1D
- -3.08%
- 1M
- 7.14%
- YTD
- 50.18%
- 6M
- 54.46%
- 1Y
- 78.68%
- 3Y*
- 26.79%
- 5Y*
- 15.69%
- 10Y*
- 15.36%
AMEA.DE vs. VGEJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR | 31.99% | 18.01% | 18.95% | 3.12% | -15.34% | 1.62% | 15.62% | 22.11% | -12.33% | 25.47% |
VGEJ.DE Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing | 50.18% | 24.74% | 3.34% | 10.27% | -4.11% | 14.06% | 11.18% | 25.07% | -6.90% | 14.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMEA.DE and VGEJ.DE is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2015 | 0.70 |
The correlation between AMEA.DE and VGEJ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (all time) to 0.84 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMEA.DE vs. VGEJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMEA.DE
VGEJ.DE
AMEA.DE vs. VGEJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VGEJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMEA.DE | VGEJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.69 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.74 | 6.17 | -1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.16 | 24.13 | -6.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMEA.DE | VGEJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85 | 3.80 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.93 | -0.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.93 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 0.79 | -0.23 |
Drawdowns
AMEA.DE vs. VGEJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMEA.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.43%, smaller than the maximum VGEJ.DE drawdown of -36.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEA.DE and VGEJ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMEA.DE | VGEJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.43% | -36.78% | +2.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.58% | -12.94% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.48% | -19.66% | -0.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.78% | -19.66% | -9.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.31% | -36.78% | +3.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.69% | -3.88% | +1.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.52% | -4.86% | -6.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 3.31% | -0.10% |
Volatility
AMEA.DE vs. VGEJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE) is 8.10%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing (VGEJ.DE) has a volatility of 10.63%. This indicates that AMEA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGEJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMEA.DE | VGEJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.10% | 10.63% | -2.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.15% | 18.75% | -2.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.29% | 20.99% | -1.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 16.70% | +1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.97% | 19.29% | -0.32% |
AMEA.DE vs. VGEJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMEA.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VGEJ.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AMEA.DE vs. VGEJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
AMEA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGEJ.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGEJ.DE Vanguard FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan UCITS ETF Distributing | 1.80% | 2.75% | 5.36% | 7.33% | 7.98% | 7.49% | 4.34% | 6.92% | 7.83% | 4.28% | 3.08% | 2.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMEA.DE and VGEJ.DE have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VGEJ.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VGEJ.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AMEA.DE.
AMEA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while VGEJ.DE tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific ex Japan. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AMEA.DE and 0.15% for VGEJ.DE.
Find the right allocation for AMEA.DE and VGEJ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer