AMEA.DE vs. V3PA.DE
AMEA.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR) and V3PA.DE (Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - AMEA.DE tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia while V3PA.DE tracks the FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Choice. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, AMEA.DE returned 22.86%/yr vs 19.30%/yr for V3PA.DE. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMEA.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for V3PA.DE.
Performance
AMEA.DE vs. V3PA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AMEA.DE having a 31.99% return and V3PA.DE slightly lower at 31.55%.
AMEA.DE
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- 7.99%
- YTD
- 31.99%
- 6M
- 34.41%
- 1Y
- 55.18%
- 3Y*
- 22.86%
- 5Y*
- 8.87%
- 10Y*
- 11.07%
V3PA.DE
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 7.31%
- YTD
- 31.55%
- 6M
- 33.90%
- 1Y
- 51.00%
- 3Y*
- 19.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMEA.DE vs. V3PA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR | 31.99% | 18.01% | 18.95% | 3.12% | 4.69% |
V3PA.DE Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating | 31.55% | 16.47% | 7.66% | 10.91% | 3.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMEA.DE and V3PA.DE is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2022 | 0.67 |
The correlation between AMEA.DE and V3PA.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMEA.DE vs. V3PA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMEA.DE
V3PA.DE
AMEA.DE vs. V3PA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE) and Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3PA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMEA.DE | V3PA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.52 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.74 | 4.43 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.16 | 16.46 | +0.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMEA.DE | V3PA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.85 | 2.80 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 1.25 | -0.69 |
Drawdowns
AMEA.DE vs. V3PA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMEA.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.43%, which is greater than V3PA.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEA.DE and V3PA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMEA.DE | V3PA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.43% | -17.58% | -16.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.58% | -11.44% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.48% | -17.58% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.69% | -1.83% | -0.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.52% | -2.80% | -8.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.21% | 3.08% | +0.13% |
Volatility
AMEA.DE vs. V3PA.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.10% compared to Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF (USD) Accumulating (V3PA.DE) at 6.33%. This indicates that AMEA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than V3PA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMEA.DE | V3PA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.10% | 6.33% | +1.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.15% | 15.56% | +0.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.29% | 18.10% | +1.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.27% | 15.34% | +2.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.97% | 15.34% | +3.63% |
AMEA.DE vs. V3PA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMEA.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than V3PA.DE's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AMEA.DE vs. V3PA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither AMEA.DE nor V3PA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AMEA.DE and V3PA.DE have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, V3PA.DE is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
V3PA.DE is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AMEA.DE.
AMEA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while V3PA.DE tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Choice. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AMEA.DE and 0.17% for V3PA.DE.
Find the right allocation for AMEA.DE and V3PA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer