AMEA.DE vs. PR1J.DE
AMEA.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR) and PR1J.DE (Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D)) are both exchange-traded funds - AMEA.DE is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while PR1J.DE is a Japan Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Japan Large & Mid Cap. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AMEA.DE returned 7.81%/yr vs 9.97%/yr for PR1J.DE. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMEA.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PR1J.DE.
Performance
AMEA.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMEA.DE achieves a 23.16% return, which is significantly higher than PR1J.DE's 15.80% return.
AMEA.DE
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- -9.94%
- 6M
- 15.40%
- YTD
- 23.16%
- 1Y
- 37.53%
- 3Y*
- 20.56%
- 5Y*
- 7.81%
- 10Y*
- 9.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.35%
PR1J.DE
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- -3.47%
- 6M
- 9.43%
- YTD
- 15.80%
- 1Y
- 34.15%
- 3Y*
- 15.96%
- 5Y*
- 9.97%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -42.28%
AMEA.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR | 23.16% | 18.02% | 18.95% | 3.13% | -15.22% | 1.46% | 15.62% | 15.30% |
PR1J.DE Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) | 15.80% | 12.92% | 13.38% | 16.35% | -11.58% | 10.23% | 5.10% | -99.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMEA.DE and PR1J.DE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2019 | 0.53 |
The correlation between AMEA.DE and PR1J.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMEA.DE vs. PR1J.DE — Risk / Return Rank
AMEA.DE
PR1J.DE
AMEA.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE) and Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1J.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AMEA.DE | PR1J.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.32 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.83 | 3.30 | -0.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.19 | 10.68 | -1.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AMEA.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMEA.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.43%, smaller than the maximum PR1J.DE drawdown of -99.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEA.DE and PR1J.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMEA.DE | PR1J.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.43% | -99.34% | +63.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.20% | -10.29% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.46% | -16.25% | -4.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.47% | -18.66% | -8.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.86% | -98.42% | +86.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.78% | -97.50% | +86.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.07% | 3.19% | +0.88% |
Volatility
AMEA.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR (AMEA.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.01% compared to Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) (PR1J.DE) at 6.34%. This indicates that AMEA.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PR1J.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMEA.DE | PR1J.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.01% | 6.34% | +3.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.59% | 16.00% | +3.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.25% | 19.81% | +2.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.90% | 16.69% | +2.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 40.15% | -20.95% |
AMEA.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMEA.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than PR1J.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
AMEA.DE vs. PR1J.DE - Dividend Comparison
AMEA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PR1J.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMEA.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets Asia UCITS ETF EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PR1J.DE Amundi Prime Japan UCITS ETF DR (D) | 1.51% | 1.75% | 1.91% | 1.90% | 2.21% | 1.80% | 1.73% | 1.87% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMEA.DE and PR1J.DE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PR1J.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PR1J.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for AMEA.DE.
AMEA.DE is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while PR1J.DE is Japan Equities. AMEA.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Asia, while PR1J.DE tracks Solactive GBS Japan Large & Mid Cap. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for AMEA.DE and 0.05% for PR1J.DE.
Find the right allocation for AMEA.DE and PR1J.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer